Skip to content

Lac-Etchemin, QC · Charitable organization

L'Armee de Marie Inc

Nous publions des écrits spirituels visant à promouvoir les valeurs chrétiennes.

C$275k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$150k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k3 grants · C$300
  • C$50k–250k2 grants · C$275k
C$100
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LA FAMILLE DES FILS ET FILLES DE MARIE INC.C$150,000
INSTITUT MARIALYS INC.C$125,000
COVENANT HOUSEC$100
FONDATION SANTÉ BEAUCE-ETCHEMINC$100
FONDATION DES SOURDSC$100
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$980k · 9 repeat orgsC$2k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
11

Total granted

C$980k
C$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+45%

Still filing today

100%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • LF
    LA FAMILLE DES FILS ET FILLES DE MARIE INC.
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$751k · revenue +206% · 59% of their budget
  • IM
    INSTITUT MARIALYS INC.
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$227k · revenue +48%
  • CH
    COVENANT HOUSE
    4× · 2018–2024 · C$350 · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • LC
    LA CROIX ROUGE
    one grant, 2023 · C$1k · revenue -48%
  • FC
    FONDATION CHEOgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · C$555 · revenue +75%
  • I
    INTER-PARESgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$100 · revenue +54%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fondation du Chu de Québec

Organisme qui a comme mission de financier et subventionner la recherche l'enseignement l'équipement médical spécialisé et de haute technologie nécessaire à l'avancement scientifique et clinique et toutes les activités liées à…

—
2
Fondation de l'Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal

Accumuler des fonds pour financier la recherche effectuée par l'institut de recherches cliniques de montréal

—
3
La Fondation Santé
—
4
Fondation de la fédération des médecins spécialistes du Québec

Dons à des donataires reconnus

—
5
Fondation Travail et Santé Mentale
—
6
La Fondation de l'Université Laval
—
7
Fondation Marcelle et Jean Coutu

Dons à des donataires reconnus.

—
8
Fondation médicale des laurentides et des pays-d'en-haut
—
9
Fondation Marie-Vincent

Centre d'expertise marie vincent chaire de recherche interuniversitaire marie vincent

—
10
Fonds de recherche Inclusion sociale (Fris)
—
11
Fondation de l'Université du Québec à Montréal

La fondation utilise ses revenus pour favoriser et soutenir le développement et l'avancement de l'enseignement à l'université due québec à montréal

—
12
Le Fonds Quebecois Pour Le Developpement International
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La Fondation Des Sourds Du Quebec (F.S.Q.) Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Maison Catherine De Longpre. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLA FAMILLE DES FILS ET FILLES DE MARIE INC. — C$751,000 over 3y, 59% of budgetINSTITUT MARIALYS INC. — C$227,000 over 8y, 20% of budgetLA CROIX ROUGE — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION SANTÉ BEAUCE-ETCHEMIN — C$850 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION CHEO — C$555 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE — C$350 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLEUCAN — C$300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAIDE À L'ÉGLISE EN DÉTRESSE — C$200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION DES SOURDS — C$150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTER-PARES — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ CANADIENNE DE LA SCLÉROSE EN PLAQUES — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION HÔTEL-DIEU DE LÉVIS — C$100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFondation des Aveugles du Québec — C$100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFondation Emergo — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFondation de l'Arche — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSociété canadienne de la SP - division du Québec — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMaison Catherine de Longpré — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Soeurs de la Charite de Saint-Louis Du QuébecQC8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Soeurs de la Charite de Saint-Louis Du Québec · Les Augustines de la Miséricorde de Jésus du Monastère Saint-Augustin · Fondation Québec Philanthrope · Wcpd Foundation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under support of religion.

Source object 131959553:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on L'Armee de Marie’s filings →