Brampton, ON · Public foundation
Konkani Association of Ontario
Food bank collection drives members volunteering at food banks.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Sringeri Vidya Bharati Foundation Canada | C$6,500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- SVSringeri Vidya Bharati Foundation Canada2× · 2023–2024 · C$9k
- SVSringeri Vidya Bharati Foundation Canada4× · 2018–2022 · C$6k · revenue +62%
- HKHari Krishan Publication2× · 2017–2022 · C$3k · revenue +31%
Funded once
- SCSewa Canada International Aid Inc.one grant, 2021 · C$1k · revenue -83%
- HSHindu Samaj of Hamilton and Regionone grant, 2023 · C$1k · revenue +2%
- CMCHINMAYA MISSION TORONTOone grant, 2018 · C$251 · revenue +1%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Sringeri Vidya Bharati Foundation Canada ↗
- Who funds Hari Krishan Publication ↗
- Who funds Sewa Canada International Aid Inc. ↗
- Who funds Hindu Samaj of Hamilton and Region ↗
- Who funds CHINMAYA MISSION TORONTO ↗
- Who funds Canadian Cancer Society ↗
- Who funds The Hospital for Sick Children Foundation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Toronto · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.