Kelowna, BC · Private foundation
Kls Foundation
To receive gifts bequests funds and property and to hold invest administer and distribute funds and property for the purposes of the foundation for such other organizations as are ' qualified donees' under the provisions of the income tax act and for such other purposes and activities as are authorized for registered charities…
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THIRD SPACE CHARITY SOCIETY | C$90,806 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- TSTHIRD SPACE CHARITY SOCIETY5× · 2017–2024 · C$258k · revenue +228% · 28% of their budget
- KTKELOWNA TRINITY BAPTIST LEGACY FOUNDATION2× · 2017–2018 · C$37k · revenue +87%
- MPMACKAY & PARTNERS FOUNDATION4× · 2017–2020 · C$7k · revenue +39%
Funded once
- FFFALCON FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · C$72k · revenue +16%
- KSKARIS SUPPORT SOCIETYgraduatedone grant, 2019 · C$50k · revenue +64%
- CFCOPS FOR KIDS CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · C$25k · revenue -10%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Foundation receives and maintains funds for the benefit of registered charities and universities that are qualified donees.
Making gifts to qualified donees
Making gifts to qualified donees
Donations to qualified donees
Gifts to qualified donees
Hold and invest funds and property for the purpose of disbursing exclusively to 'qualified donees'. particularly those that impact children & youth through long-term success programs in addition to family support through children & youth.
Solitic and receive gifts bequests trusts funds and property and beneficially as a trustee or agent to hold invest develop manage accumulate administer and disbuse funds and property pursuant to the provisions of the income tax act to…
Donation to other registered charities
Gifts to qualified donees.
To provide funds to 'qualified donees' as defined in the income tax act
The robbins foundation makes donations to qualified donees
It made gifts to qualified donees.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life of Canada Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Patrons of the Arts for the Vatican Museums Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THIRD SPACE CHARITY SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds FALCON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KARIS SUPPORT SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds KELOWNA TRINITY BAPTIST LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COPS FOR KIDS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds MACKAY & PARTNERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM'S DOOR ↗
- Who funds KELOWNA FOUNDATION FOR HOPE AND SOCIAL INNOVATION ↗
- Who funds PATRONS OF THE ARTS FOR THE VATICAN MUSEUMS INC. ↗
- Who funds WILLOW PARK CHURCH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Falcon Foundation · Sonrise Foundation · First West Foundation · Rotary Club of Kelowna Foundation · The Calgary Foundation · Creating Courage Charitable Foundation · Gateway Foundation · Kelowna Trinity Baptist Church · Courage Foundation · Nicola Wealth Private Giving Foundation · Central Okanagan Foundation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.