Scarborough, ON · Charitable organization
Kinvia
Kinvia previously known as Canadian Feed The Children is an international non-governmental organization supporting children youth and their communities in overcoming systemic barriers to their rights to nutritious and culturally appropriate food since 1986.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- C$10k–50k11 grants · C$333k
- C$50k–250k6 grants · C$406k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | C$75,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$73,400 |
| Chippewas of Nawash First Nation/Neyasshinigmiling | C$70,000 |
| Incorporated Hamlet of Tulita | C$65,000 |
| Beardy's & Okemasis' Cree Nation | C$63,000 |
| Liidlii Kue First Nation | C$60,000 |
| Sambaa K'e First Nation | C$45,000 |
| Sayisi Dene First Nation/Tadoule Lake | C$43,400 |
| Boys and Girls Club of Thomspon Inc | C$38,300 |
| Tobique | C$35,000 |
| Stein Valley Nlakapamux School | C$30,000 |
| Muskeg Lake Cree Nation #102 | C$30,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | C$30,000 |
| Atikameg First Nations school | C$27,000 |
| Ojibways of the Pic River First Nation/Biigtigong Nishnaabeg | C$22,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 83% of grant dollars (C$2.9M). The 17% that went abroad (C$585k) is mapped below.
Which regions your grants reach
Beyond home — 17% of all-years giving (C$585k)
0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
20 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$255k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- IGIndividual grant recipient5× · 2020–2024 · C$458k
- IGIndividual grant recipient5× · 2020–2024 · C$341k
- COChippewas of Nawash First Nation4× · 2020–2023 · C$281k
Funded once
- BOBeardy's & Okemasis SK (Willow Cree)one grant, 2023 · C$73k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.