Skip to content

Saskatoon, SK · Charitable organization

Kinsmen Foundation Inc.

The kinsmen foundation is a volunteer organization that provides special needs equipment and access to medical assistance to residents of sask who have nowhere else to turn.

C$1.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
26
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$500k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k3 grants · C$17k
  • C$10k–50k16 grants · C$453k
  • C$50k–250k5 grants · C$504k
  • C$250k+2 grants · C$805k
C$34,131
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CANCER FOUNDATION OF SASKATCHEWANC$500,000
HOSPITALS OF REGINAC$305,250
SASKATCHEWAN PREVENTION INSTITUTEC$140,000
ROYAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INCC$100,000
SHERBROOKE COMMUNITY CENTREC$95,000
MONT ST JOSEPH HOMEC$90,000
DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION SASKC$78,964
DRAKE PARK PROJECT INCC$45,000
SASKABILITIES - CAMP EASTER SEALSC$44,595
WEYBURN CARE A VANC$40,000
SILVER WINGS ACCESS VAN INCC$40,000
SAKITAWAK GROUP HOME INCC$40,000
COMMUNITY SERVICES OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY - SASKATCHEWANC$34,131
ST JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONC$31,096
SANTA MARIA FOUNDATIONC$30,488
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$4.4M · 21 repeat orgsC$2.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
68

Total granted

C$4.4M
C$1.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+13%

Still filing today

81%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$498k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SASKATCHEWAN PREVENTION INSTITUTE
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$1.0M · revenue +7%
  • SP
    ST. PAUL'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2018–2023 · C$802k · revenue +30%
  • CF
    CANCER FOUNDATION OF SASKATCHEWAN
    2× · 2021–2024 · C$600k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • SA
    ST. ANN'S SENIOR VILLAGE
    one grant, 2019 · C$200k · revenue -4%
  • VH
    VICTORIA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · C$182k · revenue -7%
  • S
    STARS
    one grant, 2019 · C$89k · revenue +23%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Eden Care Suites Inc.

Eden care suites-housing-seniors/low income/disabilities saskatchewan health authority funded independent assessed living (12 suites) private independent assisted living (8 suites)

—
2
Saskatoon Regional Health Authority

We operate a health delivery system providing a full range of health care services to residents of the Saskatoon Health Region and other residents of Saskatchewan. Services are provided in hospitals, long-term care facilities, primary…

—
3
Prairie Wind Estate Inc.

Providing retirement living for seniors with necessary care in the southwest saskatchewan area.

—
4
Saskatoon Convalescent Home

The organization owns and operates a special care home for the aged. the home provides care for the aged. the home provides care to individuals who require assistance to meet their physical mental social and/or spiritual needs. in doing so…

—
5
Clare Parker Homes Inc.

Provide home support services for 62 individuals with intellectual disabilities in 13 group homes located in Regina SK. In addition provide day time support for 11 non-residential individuals in the community

—
6
Duck Lake and District Nursing Home Inc.

Operation of a nursing home providing accomodations programs and services to individuals with special needs.

—
7
Bow Valley Villa Corp

Owned & operated 20 room personal care home in oxbow sask. carried on with day to day activities suitable to the needs of 20 level 1 & 2 residents

—
8
Saskatchewan Heart Centre Inc.
—
9
Saskatoon Convalescent Home Foundation Inc

Support for saskatoon convalescent home for the aged.

—
10
Southern Alberta Society for the Handicapped

Rehabilitation services for adults with developmental disabilities. Services consist of day and residential programs in Magrath Raymond Welling and Lethbridge Alberta

—
11
Heartland Housing Foundation

Providing senior and affordable housing and related services within the sub-region of strathcona county and the city of fort saskatchewan

—
12
Lunenburg Home for Special Care Corporation

144 bed long-term care facility providing living support to senior citizens in lunenburg nova scotia.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spruce Manor Special Care Home Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is South East Cornerstone School Division No. 209. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

73 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 73 of the 104 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
71/73
Grantees still filing
48/73
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10kC$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSASKATCHEWAN PREVENTION INSTITUTE — C$1,005,000 over 8y, 6.7% of budgetST. PAUL'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$801,702 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetCANCER FOUNDATION OF SASKATCHEWAN — C$600,000 over 2y, 9.6% of budgetHOSPITALS OF REGINA — C$455,250 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetSHERBROOKE COMMUNITY CENTRE — C$371,755 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetROYAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — C$242,385 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetST. ANN'S SENIOR VILLAGE — C$200,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetJIM PATTISON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$198,517 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSt. Joseph's Hospital Foundation — C$190,606 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetVICTORIA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$181,615 over 1y, 12% of budgetSTARS — C$88,968 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWEST CENTRAL ABILITIES INC. — C$85,104 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetThe Health Foundation of East Central Sk Inc. — C$84,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetALS SOCIETY OF SASKATCHEWAN INC. — C$76,361 over 1y, 38% of budgetSK HEALTH AUTHORITY (ADULT REHAB PROGRAM) — C$65,966 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSASKABILITIES - CAMP EASTER SEALS — C$64,978 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFIRST STEPS WELLNESS CENTRE INC. — C$59,680 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetDR. NOBLE IRWIN REGIONAL HEALTH CARE — C$50,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetNORTH CENTRAL HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION — C$50,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetWestview School Community Council (South East Cornerstone Sc — C$40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWEYBURN CARE A VAN — C$40,000 over 1y, 39% of budgetELMWOOD RESIDENCES INC. — C$40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPORCUPINE OPPORTUNITIES PROGRAM — C$40,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPARADISE HILL CARE HOME — C$38,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetSAMARITAN PLACE — C$30,885 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWIND ON MY WINGS SAILING CLUB — C$30,550 over 1y, 62% of budgetSANTA MARIA FOUNDATION — C$30,488 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE'S HOME INC — C$25,452 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBATTLEFORDS UNION HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — C$25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCanadian Mental Health Association — C$23,513 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetWYNYARD CARRES INC. — C$22,100 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetEAGLESTONE LODGE PERSONAL CARE HOME — C$20,629 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetSouthwest Homes — C$20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOliver Lodge — C$20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCANWOOD & DISTRICT BUS ASSOCIATION INC. — C$20,000 over 1y, 82% of budgetBATTLEFORDS RESIDENTIAL SERVICES INC. — C$20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetShepherd's Villa Inc. — C$20,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetWEYBURN WOR-KIN SHOP CORP — C$20,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNORTHSASK SPECIAL NEEDS — C$19,200 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetSanctum Care Group — C$17,700 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetLuther Sunset Home of Saskatoon — C$16,488 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetL'Arche Saskatoon — C$16,321 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetREDVERS ACTIVITY CENTRE INC. — C$16,117 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLUTHERCARE FOUNDATION INC. — C$15,745 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetYMCA of Moose Jaw Inc. — C$15,734 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCupar & District Nursing Home Inc — C$15,600 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCosmopolitan Industries — C$15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRail City Industries — C$15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saskatoon Community FoundationSK21.6× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saskatoon Community Foundation · Saskatchewan Community Foundation Corp. · Sasktel Telcare Employees Charity Trust · United Way of Saskatoon and Area · United Way of Regina · Maunders McNeil Foundation Inc. · Episcopal Corporation of Saskatoon · Leslie & Irene Dube Foundation Inc. · Lily Street Foundation · Our Lady of the Prairies Foundation · Les Filles de la Providence · The Sisters of the Presentation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 104 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under community resource.

Source object 107571630:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Kinsmen’s filings →