Skip to content
Canadian charities

Burlington, ON · Private foundation

Kingsway Charitable Foundation

To receive and maintain a fund or funds and to apply all or part of the principal and income therefrom from time to time to qualified donees as defined in subsection 149.1(1) of the ITA (Canada)

C$39k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$13k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k8 grants · C$26k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$13k
C$2,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$32k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BABA AAUGHARGH SHRI FATEH NATH JI CHARITABLE TRUSTC$13,000
Hindu Samaj of HamiltonC$9,862
AIM for SevaC$9,000
C.I.F. Charitable FoundationC$2,000
Amma CanadaC$2,000
Sai Bhakti DhamC$1,500
Hindu Heritage CentreC$573
William Osler Health System FoundationC$500
Muscular Dystrophy CanadaC$500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$138k · 3 repeat orgsC$21k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
2

Total granted

C$138k
C$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+59%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$18k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    Hindu Samaj of Hamilton
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$121k · revenue +2%
  • AF
    AIM for Seva
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$11k · revenue +28%
  • CC
    C.I.F. Charitable Foundation
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$7k · revenue +103%

Funded once

  • HI
    Handi-Care Int'lgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$2k · revenue +59%
  • OH
    Oakville Hospitalgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$601 · revenue +47%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hindu Dharma Mandir
—
2
The Nargis Dutt Cancer Foundation

Provide medical equipment and related supplies to hospital and medical centres in india

—
3
Sai Foundation Inc.
—
4
South Asian Long Term Care Foundation

Continuing fundraising to build long term care facility for seniors.

—
5
Nishkam Seva Charitable Foundation
—
6
Hari Om Hindu Temple

Hindu ritual temple with hindu ritual teachings

—
7
S.G.L. Charitable Society

Society raise funds to donate to charitable hospitals in india and health education societies in india

—
8
Manzal Humanitarian Foundation

Running a charitable clinic and building a hospital for 50 beds

—
9
Om Shri Shirdi Sai Dwarkamai Dham
—
10
Toronto Hanuman Mandir Cultural Centre
—
11
Pchs Foundation

Raise funds for Langar on Wheels programme.

—
12
Hamilton Health Sciences Foundation

Raise manage and distribute funds in support of our hospitals and cancer centre for patient care research education equipment renovations and capital expenditures.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Amma Canada and the most unlike its peers is Cif Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHindu Samaj of Hamilton — C$120,862 over 2y, 19% of budgetAIM for Seva — C$10,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetC.I.F. Charitable Foundation — C$7,000 over 2y, 9.4% of budgetAmma Canada — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHandi-Care Int'l — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSai Bhakti Dham — C$1,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetOakville Hospital — C$601 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHindu Heritage Centre — C$573 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWilliam Osler Health System Foundation — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMuscular Dystrophy Canada — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

CHIMP: Charitable Imp…United Way of Greater…Canadian Online Givin…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadahelps Canadon
CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada)BC4.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · United Way of Greater Toronto · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 774238414:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Kingsway’s filings →