Kingston, NB · Charitable organization
Kingston Peninsula Foursquare Gospel Church Inc
Church services proclaiming the gospel of jesus christ services/studies/mission support.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FOURSQUARE CHURCH OF CANADA | C$2,287 |
| CHURCH RENEWAL | C$1,260 |
| WYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS | C$1,200 |
| CENTRAL CHRISTIAN CHURCH | C$640 |
| OUTFLOW MINISTRIES | C$580 |
| PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTRE | C$520 |
| EVERY HOME FOR CHRIST INTERNATIONAL/CANADA | C$480 |
| VOICE OF THE MARTYRS | C$480 |
| NB RIGHT TO LIFE ASSOCIATION LTD | C$480 |
| TRANSPORT FOR CHRIST | C$240 |
| HESTIA HOUSE | C$240 |
| THE GIDEONS INTERNATIONAL IN CANADA CHARITABLE FUND | C$60 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
15 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$60 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- WBWYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS8× · 2017–2024 · C$9k · revenue +23%
- PRPREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTRE8× · 2017–2024 · C$4k · revenue +34%
- CRCHURCH RENEWAL4× · 2021–2024 · C$4k · revenue +70%
Funded once
- FGFoursquare Gospel Church of Canadaone grant, 2017 · C$4k
- NRNB RIGHT TO LIFE ASSOC. LTDone grant, 2023 · C$480
- EIEHC INTERNATIONAL/CANADAone grant, 2023 · C$440
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Planting churches training and coaching pastors training elders resourcing churches
The organization distributes Christian literature and erects Gospel message signs throughout Canada.
We exist to preach and advance the teachings of the Christian faith and the religious tenets doctrines and observances by providing consultation instructional material curriculum development and best practices; and to propagate the…
1. teaching and preaching 2. church planting 3. outreach 4. discipleship
To provide training and teaching to Christian church leaders around the world.
We conducted seminars and distributed resource materials for the purpose of encouraging church health and growth through evangelism.
The organization provides retreats counselling and teaching to Pastors Missionaries and Churches in Canada
Transforming lives through god's word through bible translation bible publishing and bible engagement programs throughout canada and the world.
Missionary training -bible studies
Pastoral counselling, guest speaking in various churches, distribution of audio and visual materials.
Conferences teaching bible study & counseling
Promulgation of the gospel of jesus christ maily through media
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Church Renewal Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Evangelical Tract Distributors. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HARVEST HOUSE GRAND MANAN ↗
- Who funds FOURSQUARE GOSPEL CHURCH OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds WYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS ↗
- Who funds PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTRE ↗
- Who funds CHURCH RENEWAL ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL CHRISTIAN CHURCH ↗
- Who funds NB Right fto Life Association LTD. ↗
- Who funds THE VOICE OF THE MARTYRS ↗
- Who funds HESTIA HOUSE ↗
- Who funds TRANSPORT FOR CHRIST ↗
- Who funds EVERY HOME FOR CHRIST INTERNATIONAL/CANADA ↗
- Who funds Evangelical Tract Distribution ↗
- Who funds THE GIDEONS INTERNATIONAL IN CANADA CHARITABLE FUND ↗
- Who funds The Gideons International in Canada ↗
- Who funds THE EFC EVANGELICAL FELLOWSHIP ↗
- Who funds HARVEST HOUSE ATLANTIC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Kings Church · Canada Donates Inc. · Abundance Canada · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · My Tribute Gift Foundation · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.