King City, ON · Charitable organization
King Bible Church
Provide church services bible studies and community outreach
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Associated Gospel Churches | C$8,040 |
| Operation Mobilization | C$8,000 |
| Northern Canada Evangelical Mission | C$3,800 |
| Action International Ministries | C$3,400 |
| Emmanel International of Canada | C$1,000 |
| Trust Communications Ministries | C$600 |
| Teen Challenge | C$600 |
| SIM Canada | C$600 |
| Agora Network Ministries | C$300 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
12 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- NCNorthern Canada Evangelical Mission6× · 2018–2024 · C$23k · revenue +53%
- AIAction International Ministries6× · 2018–2024 · C$21k · revenue +4%
- TYToronto Youth for Christ -Youth Unlimited5× · 2018–2023 · C$8k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- SCSIM Canadaone grant, 2017 · C$11k
- OMOperation Mobilizationone grant, 2017 · C$11k
- NCNorthern Canada Evangelical Missionone grant, 2017 · C$4k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide training and teaching to Christian church leaders around the world.
International Christian Ministries (ICM) trains and equips Christian leaders in Africa Eastern Europe and Latin America with and through its agents. These training initiatives include various Christian seminars and conferences facilitating…
1. teaching and preaching 2. church planting 3. outreach 4. discipleship
Preaching the gospel through broadcasting TV programs Printed publications Emergency Relief Media evangelism Campaigns
Planting churches training and coaching pastors training elders resourcing churches
Our mission is to support and partner with Christian churches and relief organizations around the world to share our faith disciple teach train and serve. We focus on Church Planting & Evangelism Relief & Development and Leadership…
A) to provide personnel and resources for christian organizations and ministries; and b) to provide training and materials to christian leaders and individuals involved in evanglism and christian ministry worldwide
Missionary trainings On-line and On-site mission trips Church planting trainings
We exist to preach and advance the teachings of the Christian faith and the religious tenets doctrines and observances by providing consultation instructional material curriculum development and best practices; and to propagate the…
Missions/evangelism
We further the gospe's reach through long-term missionary mobilization short-term theological training trips strategic church partnerships and ministry internships.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trans World Radio Canada and the most unlike its peers is Lightway Church. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OPERATION MOBILIZATION ↗
- Who funds ASSOICIATED GOSPEL CHURCHES ↗
- Who funds Northern Canada Evangelical Mission ↗
- Who funds Action International Ministries ↗
- Who funds Trans World Radio Canada ↗
- Who funds Toronto Youth for Christ -Youth Unlimited ↗
- Who funds Lightway church ↗
- Who funds EMMANUEL INTERNATIONAL OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds SIM Canada ↗
- Who funds Teen Challenge Canada Inc. ↗
- Who funds TRUST COMMUNICATIONS MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds AGORA NETWORK MINISTRIES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.