Toronto, ON · Private foundation
KFP Charitable Foundation
1.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k1 grant · C$200
- C$10k–50k5 grants · C$125k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YESHIVAT YESODEI HATORA | C$37,975 |
| KHAL TORAS CHESED-SYNAGOGUE | C$32,000 |
| BETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOL | C$21,500 |
| BAIS YAAKOV HIGH SCHOOL | C$19,600 |
| CANADIAN FRIENDS OF YESHVAT AISH HOTORAH | C$13,500 |
| JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION | C$200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +75% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$55k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- JHJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION3× · 2021–2024 · C$227k · revenue +75%
- KTKHAL TORAS CHESED - SYNAGOGUE2× · 2022–2024 · C$220k · revenue +205%
- YYYESHIVAT YESODEI HATORA2× · 2022–2024 · C$104k · revenue +25%
Funded once
- CFCDN FOUNDATION EDUCATION WELFARE OFone grant, 2022 · C$100k · revenue -49%
- YGYESHIVA GEDOLAH ZICHRONone grant, 2022 · C$88k · revenue +16%
- BYBAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY SCHOOLgraduatedone grant, 2022 · C$51k · revenue +31%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls
Operating a postsecondary institution for educating boys in orthodox jewish faith.
Operated an orthodox jewish high school geared to students who need and would benefit from individual attention not available in existing orthodox jewish high schools.
To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.
The school educates high-school age male students in both secular and jewish studies in a non-conventional way offering more attention than normal to each student.
Support of jewish education and institutions
Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.
Established and operated as an institution of jewish training and education particularly in the fields of rabbinic talmudic halachic studies.
Religious school
To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.
To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Les Amis Canadiens Du Seminaire Yeshivah Mirer De Jerusalem Inc./Canadian Friends of the Seminary Yeshivah Mirer of Jerusalem and the most unlike its peers is Hatzoloh Toronto. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KHAL TORAS CHESED - SYNAGOGUE ↗
- Who funds YESHIVAT YESODEI HATORA ↗
- Who funds CDN FOUNDATION EDUCATION WELFARE OF ↗
- Who funds YESHIVA GEDOLAH ZICHRON ↗
- Who funds BAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds HATZOLOH OF TORONTO ↗
- Who funds BETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds ZICHRON BINYOMIN CHARITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KOLLEL OHOLEI YOM TOV ↗
- Who funds BAIS YAAKOV HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds TORONTO CHEDER ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OF YESHVAT AISH HOTORAH ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OF THE MIR ↗
- Who funds BAIS YAAKOV OF THORNHILL ↗
- Who funds EITZ CHAIM SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds JACS TORONTO ↗
- Who funds BNAI ZION ↗
- Who funds BNEI ZION - BOBOV ↗
- Who funds ACHIM TORONTO ↗
- Who funds MISASKIM ↗
- Who funds EZRAS HAKAHAL ↗
- Who funds KH MEOROTH ↗
- Who funds DIENA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YESHIVA BNEI ZION - MOSDOS BOBOV ↗
- Who funds EZER MIZION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Zolty Charitable Foundation · The Mesora Charitable Foundation · The Koenig Family Foundation · J & H Feldman Charitable Foundation · Schofam Charitable Foundation · The Chaim Moshe Friedman Memorial Fund · Moral Arc Foundation · Heitner Charitable Foundation · Rayjo Charitable Trust · My Charity Fund · The Matlow Family Charitable Trust · The Dan-Hytman Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.