Skip to content

Winnipeg, MB · Private foundation

Ken & Helen Penner Family Foundation Inc.

The foundation continues to support all manner of qualified donees.

C$66k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
Regions reached
C$19k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k10 grants · C$31k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$35k
C$3,500
Median grant
4
Regions reached
C$29k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GAZA REFUGEE PROJECTC$19,000
LCC INTERNATIONAL FUND INCC$16,000
RIVER EAST MB CHURCHC$8,500
ECOLE DE THEOLOGIE EVANGELIQUE DU QUEBECC$5,000
MENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEEC$4,400
IDE CANADAC$3,500
MENNONITE CENTRE UKRAINEC$2,400
Individual grant recipientC$2,100
CANADIAN MENNONITE UNIVERSITYC$2,000
GLOBAL PEACE HEROESC$1,000
MENNONITE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATESC$1,000
INNER CITY YOUTH ALIVEC$1,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$402k · 18 repeat orgsC$41k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
17

Total granted

C$402k
C$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+25%

Still filing today

72%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • LI
    LCC International Fund Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$149k · revenue +194%
  • MC
    MENNONITE CENTRE UKRAINE
    4× · 2021–2024 · C$7k · revenue +125%
  • AD
    ACCOUNTABLE DEVELOPMENT WORKS
    3× · 2020–2022 · C$6k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • CA
    CAMP ARNES
    one grant, 2022 · C$5k
  • SM
    SILOAM MISSIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$4k · revenue +25%
  • OC
    Open Circle
    one grant, 2018 · C$2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Christian Ministries

International Christian Ministries (ICM) trains and equips Christian leaders in Africa Eastern Europe and Latin America with and through its agents. These training initiatives include various Christian seminars and conferences facilitating…

—
2
Meda Impact Investments

MEDA Impact Investments combines innovative financial and technical expertise to build and enhance sustainable agri-food systems that provide decent work for people living in poverty with a focus on systematically marginalized communities…

—
3
Mennonite Central Committee Manitoba Inc.

Mennonite Central Committee (MCC) is a global non-profit organization that strives to share God's love and compassion through relief development and peacebuilding. MCC Manitoba supports the international relief development and peace…

—
4
Millennium Relief and Development Services (Canada)

Conducted programs in the middle east africa asia carribean eastern europe canada in health and social servicces education micro-economic sustainable development disaster relief and refugee assistance

—
5
The Evangelical Mennonite Conference

In canada we are involved in evangelism church planting community programs and publication of a denominational magazine. outside canada we are involved in evangelism church planting community development leadership training and other…

—
6
AngelOne Canada

Conducts missionary work in the developing countries

—
7
Mennonite Central Committee Canada

Please see our website and within the tab 'Learn More' there is a section entitled 'What We Do'. In every country where MCC works we partner with local churches and organizations with similar values. Together we work in three areas:…

—
8
Fh Canada

Food for the Hungry (FH) Canada part of the global FH family is a Christian not-for-profit organization dedicated to ending poverty worldwide. With partners across Canada and the world FH walks alongside vulnerable communities throughout…

—
9
Canadian Centre for World Mission

Teaching students about missions-method history and missiology. service to mission - related organizations in advisory roles training practical activities in missionary work. supply missions with education related resources. addressing…

—
10
Africa Inter-Mennonite Mission Canada Inc
—
11
International Mennonite Health Association Inc.

Imha provides medical supplies training & support materials & programs (including educational) in india democratic republic of congo & burundi through relationships with in-country organizations as detailed in schedule 2

—
12
Strategic Ministry Partnerships - Canada

Relieving poverty in developing nations by providing food and other necessities of life including access to education for children of families who are poor of low income or in need.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Christian Mission Services and the most unlike its peers is Eden Mental Health Centre. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLCC International Fund Inc — C$148,950 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetEcole de Theologie Evangelique du Quebec — C$80,424 over 8y, 3.4% of budgetRIVER EAST MB CHURCH — C$34,970 over 7y, 5.0% of budgetCanadian Mennonite University — C$30,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetIDE Canada — C$25,600 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL PEACE HEROES — C$18,575 over 2y, 32% of budgetMENNONITE CENTRE UKRAINE — C$7,400 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetACCOUNTABLE DEVELOPMENT WORKS — C$5,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAccountable development works — C$3,700 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetSILOAM MISSION — C$3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN MISSION SERVICES — C$2,600 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMENNONITE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES — C$2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCANADIAN LIFELIGHT MINISTRIES — C$1,200 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetDONWOOD MANOR FOUNDATION — C$500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMENNONITE HERITAGE VILLAGE — C$400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION MICHAELLE JEAN — C$365 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEDEN MENTAL HEALTH CENTRE — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LCC International Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds Ecole de Theologie Evangelique du Quebec ↗
  • Who funds RIVER EAST MB CHURCH ↗
  • Who funds Canadian Mennonite University ↗
  • Who funds IDE Canada ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL PEACE HEROES ↗
  • Who funds MENNONITE CENTRE UKRAINE ↗
  • Who funds ACCOUNTABLE DEVELOPMENT WORKS ↗
  • Who funds Accountable development works ↗
  • Who funds SILOAM MISSION ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN MISSION SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds MENNONITE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES ↗
  • Who funds CANADIAN LIFELIGHT MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds DONWOOD MANOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MENNONITE HERITAGE VILLAGE ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION MICHAELLE JEAN ↗
  • Who funds EDEN MENTAL HEALTH CENTRE ↗
  • Who funds WINNIPEG ART GALLERY ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bill and Margaret Fast Family Foundation Inc.MB12.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bill and Margaret Fast Family Foundation Inc. · De Fehr Foundation Inc. · Abundance Canada · Lawton Partners Charitable Giving Foundation Inc. · Portage Avenue Church · F & E Strumpski Foundation · The Buller Foundation Inc. · Reimer Express Foundation Inc. · Manitoba Council for International Co-Operation Inc. · The Winnipeg Foundation · Nicola Wealth Private Giving Foundation · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada)

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 848946240:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Ken & Helen Penner Family’s filings →