Richmond, BC · Private foundation
Keil Family Trust
Making donations in an orderly fashion to qualified donees
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- C$10k–50k4 grants · C$45k
- C$50k–250k1 grant · C$73k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER VANCOUVER | C$73,252 |
| CHARITABLE IMPACT FOUNDATION | C$15,000 |
| BC CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | C$10,000 |
| KING DAVID HIGH SHCOOL | C$10,000 |
| CHABAD OF RICHMOND | C$10,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$10k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- JCJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION5× · 2017–2024 · C$242k · revenue +191%
- CFChimp Foundation2× · 2018–2024 · C$61k · revenue +36%
- KDKing David High School4× · 2017–2024 · C$35k · revenue +56%
Funded once
- JFJEWISH FAMILY SERVICEone grant, 2017 · C$35k · revenue +22%
- TRTHE RICHMOND JEWISH DAY SCHOOL SOCIETY OF BRITISH COLUMBgraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$18k · revenue +39%
- JNJEWISH NATIONAL FUNDone grant, 2017 · C$6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Fostering and conducting religious jewish educating in bc
The charity provides scholarships and promotes the study of judaism carrying out educational programming both in and out of schools, intensive study workshops and teacher training in biblical studies.
The jewish foundation of greater toronto receives manages and invests funds as well as disburses grants to qualified donees. using a research-driven approach the jewish foundation of greater toronto strategically distributes to community…
Jcfc allocates funds provided by donors to further the religious and educatinal need of the calgary jewish community the calgary community at large and canadian jewry. its programs promote the foundation to potential donors and distributes…
Advancement of jewish education through religion language culture tradition history and philosophy courses.
Support of jewish education and institutions
The charitycontinues to receive donations and investment revenue and to make allocations to 'the calgary jewish academy'
Programs in which primarily university students are able to acquire and cultivate jewish learning wisdom throught and culture
The jccv is a charitable non-profit organization providing educational recreational cultural and social programs for the jewish community and the general public.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of British Columbia and the most unlike its peers is Maimonides School Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Chimp Foundation ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds King David High School ↗
- Who funds BC CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds Beth Tikvah Congregation ↗
- Who funds THE RICHMOND JEWISH DAY SCHOOL SOCIETY OF BRITISH COLUMB ↗
- Who funds CHABAD OF RICHMOND ↗
- Who funds CHABAD OF RICHMOND ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTRE OF GREATER VANCOUVER ↗
- Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND ↗
- Who funds BC Cancer Foundation ↗
- Who funds ORT CANADA ↗
- Who funds CANADA GIVES ↗
- Who funds LOUIS BRIER JEWISH AGED FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC TORAH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds BUILDING A JEWISH TOMORROW ↗
- Who funds Canadian Cancer Society ↗
- Who funds The Board of Education of School District No. 38 ↗
- Who funds HEART AND STROKE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds REACH CHILD AND YOUTH DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Zlc Foundation · Jewish Federation of British Columbia · Nicola Wealth Private Giving Foundation · Marsid Family Foundation · Lohn Foundation · Kahn Foundation · The Arnold and Anita Silber Family Foundation · United Way British Columbia · The Dayhu Family Foundation · Conam Charitable Foundation · The Joseph Segal Family Foundation · B.C. Turf Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.