Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Toronto, ON · Charitable organization

Kashruth Council of Canada / le Conseil Cacherout Du Canada

The charity promotes the observance of orthodox judaism by ensuring the availability and identification of kosher products through its supervision and certification of food service production.

C$180k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$178k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k1 grant · C$2k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$178k
C$178,200
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$5.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HALACHA INSTITUTE OF TORONTOC$178,200
KEREN ONTARIOC$1,800
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$1.1M · 5 repeat orgsC$16k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
8

Total granted

C$1.1M
C$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+78%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    MATAN FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2022 · C$900k · revenue +2% · 93% of their budget
  • HI
    HALACHA INSTITUTE OF TORONTO
    2× · 2017–2024 · C$190k · revenue ×27 · 67% of their budget
  • SS
    Social Services and Communal Matters Fund
    4× · 2017–2020 · C$10k · revenue +94%

Funded once

  • HA
    Halachic Academy Ravadgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$6k · revenue +142%
  • CF
    Community Funds for Families and Childrengraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$4k · revenue +88%
  • JH
    JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · C$4k · revenue +68%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Maasim Tovim Foundation

To provide funds to registered charities

—
2
The Chabad Rehovot Fund
—
3
The Haichel Hatorah B'zion Foundation

The charity collected funds from the public for the purpose of providing scholarships for deserving students attending haichel hatorah b'zion institutions.

—
4
Yeshivah Toras Chaim

The charity provides scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to study at yeshiva toras chalm

—
5
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
6
Keren Hatorah Charity Fund

To engage in charitable activities as follows: the furtherance of education and to provide gifts to other charitable organizations and the advancement of religion.

—
7
The Chaim Yosef and Chana Zeifman Charitable Trust

Funding other charities

—
8
Lomdei Torah Programs

The charity received and maintained a fund to use for educational religious and other charitable purposes especially in areas pertaining to the jewish religion. the organization collected funds and these were used to promote funding to…

—
9
Kollel Yisroel Dovid

The charity provides scholarships to fund talmudic research.

—
10
Mitzvah Charity Fund

Provided funds to qualified donees to help them carry out their work

—
11
Mifal Klita

Promoted the advancement of jewish heritage culture and jewish education particularily among the underpriveledged and needy children. establish and maintain and to aid in the establishment and maintennace of schools and classes providing…

—
12
Olam Chesed Yobone Fund
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shomrai Shaboth-Chevrah Mishnayoth Congregation and the most unlike its peers is PayPal Giving Fund Canada. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMATAN FOUNDATION — C$900,000 over 3y, 93% of budgetHALACHA INSTITUTE OF TORONTO — C$190,000 over 2y, 67% of budgetKEREN ONTARIO — C$19,200 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetSocial Services and Communal Matters Fund — C$10,170 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetHalachic Academy Ravad — C$6,079 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCommunity Funds for Families and Children — C$3,600 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION — C$3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEITZ CHAIM SCHOOLS — C$1,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE — C$1,375 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAYPAL GIVING FUND CANADA — C$481 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETH CHABAD COMMUNITY CENTRE — C$360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHOMRAI SHABOTH-CHEVRA MISHNAYOTH CONGREGATION — C$350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetToronto Care Fund — C$110 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chaim Moshe Fried…Fieldgate Cares Found…Rayjo Charitable Trust479 FoundationThe Koenig Family Fou…The Gross Family Foun…The B&C Zy Gezunt Cha…J & H Feldman Charita…The S. Sigler Family …Jack and Doris Bistri…The George Hofstedter…Moral Arc Foundation
The Chaim Moshe Friedman Memorial FundON11.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chaim Moshe Friedman Memorial Fund · Fieldgate Cares Foundation · Rayjo Charitable Trust · 479 Foundation · The Koenig Family Foundation · The Gross Family Foundation · The B&C Zy Gezunt Charitable Foundation · J & H Feldman Charitable Foundation · The S. Sigler Family Charitable Foundation · Jack and Doris Bistricer Charitable Foundation · The George Hofstedter Family Foundation · Moral Arc Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under support of religion.

Source object 863251526:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Kashruth Council of Canada / le Conseil Cacherout Du Canada’s filings →