Skip to content

East York, ON · Private foundation

Julie Patel Foundation

The JULIE PATEL FOUNDATION has been founded to maintain a fund or funds and to apply all or part thereof and the income therefrom for education or career purposes and in particular to support charitable organizations that are qualified donees in activities which advance individuals in the areas of business education leadership and…

C$88k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$35k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$26,500
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$125k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAPE BRETON UNIVERSITYC$35,000
WILFRID LAURIER UNIVERSITYC$26,500
UNIVERSITY OF TORONTOC$26,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$259k · 3 repeat orgsC$122k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
5

Total granted

C$259k
C$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+7%

Still filing today

100%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$88k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    MCMASTER UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2018–2023 · C$155k · revenue +37%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO
    3× · 2018–2020 · C$52k · revenue +42%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO
    2× · 2021–2022 · C$52k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • RU
    RYERSON UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · C$27k · revenue +11%
  • RC
    ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS IN IRELAND - CHARITY ...
    one grant, 2022 · C$2k
  • TO
    THE ONTARIO COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2019 · C$2k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Brock University

Teaching and Research in broadly based undergraduate and graduate education programs including professional and interdisciplinary programs. The University provides education programs across seven faculties: Applied Health Sciences Business…

—
2
University of Ottawa / UniversitÉ D'ottawa

The university of ottawa offers post-secondary education.

—
3
Carleton University

Carleton University provides post-secondary education.

—
4
The University of Manitoba

The University of Manitoba provides post-secondary education to undergraduate graduate and professional students. The University also conducts research in a broad array of academic disciplines. There are numerous educational and research…

—
5
University of Victoria

The University of Victoria is a comprehensive research university offering a wide range of undergraduate graduate and continuing studies programs.

—
6
The University of St. Michael's College

The University of St. Michael's College is a Catholic post-secondary educational and research institution federated with the University of Toronto. The University offers undergraduate courses in the arts and sciences through its Arts and…

—
7
Universite Concordia

The main mission of the University is to provide post-secondary and graduate education. It engages in research public services and assists students faculties and researchers. Concordia University Faculty of Arts and Science Gina Cody…

—
8
Saint Mary's University

Saint Mary’s University is one of Canada’s top primarily undergraduate universities known for its international collaborations leadership in entrepreneurship and research that benefits local and global communities. We provide undergraduate…

—
9
University of Saskatchewan

The University of Saskatchewan's primary role is to provide post-secondary instruction and research in humanities sciences and other areas of human intellectual cultural social and physical development. The University offers instructional…

—
10
Uts Foundation

Developing and maintaining funds to assist the students of university of toronto schools by providing scholarships fellowships bursaries and financial assistance.

—
11
University of the Fraser Valley

The University of the Fraser Valley is a special purpose teaching university. The University is governed by a Board of Governors the majority of which are appointed by the Province of British Columbia. The primary purpose of the University…

—
12
University of Northern British Columbia

Provide post secondary education and research in the following 1) natural resources 2) environmental studies 3) business 4) science 5) health and human science 6) arts 7) civil and environmental engineering 8) graduate studies

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is York University and the most unlike its peers is Scholarship Bursary & Education Committee Medical Alumni Ass. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMCMASTER UNIVERSITY — C$155,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO — C$52,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO — C$52,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCAPE BRETON UNIVERSITY — C$35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRYERSON UNIVERSITY — C$26,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILFRID LAURIER UNIVERSITY — C$26,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF TORONTO — C$26,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetYORK UNIVERSITY — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Canadahelps CanadonON2.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under teaching institutions.

Source object 813457603:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Julie Patel’s filings →