Skip to content

Langley, BC · Private foundation

Joyful Living Joyful Giving Foundation

JOYFUL LIVING JOYFUL GIVING FOUNDATION grants to canadian charities working in areas of religion canadian social services international aid and development as well as community organizations within canada.

C$75k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
Regions reached
C$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k1 grant · C$8k
  • C$10k–50k4 grants · C$66k
C$13,522
Median grant
4
Regions reached
C$5k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL CANADAC$20,000
INVESTING HOPEC$20,000
THE WELLSPRING FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATIONC$13,522
UMOJAC$12,935
CANADIAN FOODGRAINS BANK ASSOCIATION INCC$8,250
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$601k · 7 repeat orgsC$43k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
5

Total granted

C$601k
C$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+84%

Still filing today

100%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    EQUIP CANADA
    2× · 2022–2023 · C$77k · revenue +14%
  • IH
    INNER HOPE
    3× · 2019–2022 · C$68k · revenue +42%
  • SF
    SPARTAN FOUNDATION
    3× · 2018–2022 · C$39k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • SF
    Spartan Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · C$13k
  • BS
    BLUE SEA PHILANTHROPY INC.graduated
    one grant, 2020 · C$5k · revenue +84%
  • CC
    Canadian Children's Shelter of Hope Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · C$3k · revenue -77%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Spark of Hope Foundation

The foundation collaborates and partners with universities around the world to ensure marginalized young females primarily from the Global South in remote areas and in areas of conflict get access to post secondary education through…

—
2
Children Believe Fund

Children Believe is a global charity dedicated to removing the barriers to education that steal children’s choices one by one until they have none. For sixty years the organization has brought together brave young dreamers caring…

—
3
One Girl Can Society

One Girl Can gives some of the world’s most vulnerable high-potential girls a chance to rise above extreme poverty and gender inequality. Through education training and mentoring girls are empowered to achieve their goals earn a meaningful…

—
4
Impacthope

We are a faith based organization partnering with national christian leaders. together we develop sustainable projects that address the cycle of poverty. our efforts include the construction of a hospital in guatemala; two children homes…

—
5
Cascade Institute Research Society

Using advanced methods to map and model complex global systems we analyze interactions between systemic risks to anticipate future crises and identify opportunities for high-leverage interventions in social systems. By acting as a network…

—
6
Hope for the Nations

To support children at risk due to war poverty illiteracy and child trafficking in developing countries through community-based care education and enterprise development with partnerships to: i. operate homes/foster homes for children in…

—
7
Hope for Rwanda's Children Fund

Hope for rwanda's children fund is dedicated to alleviating the poverty of rwandan children. its principal project is the hrcf scholarship program. funding for the hrcf scholarship program is provided to coincide with the academic year in…

—
8
Project Harvest - Proyecto Cosecha

Project Harvest empowers rural families through training in food security and women's leadership.

—
9
Hope Returns

Relieves poverty with a special focus on victims of human trafficking

—
10
The Water School

Through implementing partners the water school runs programs focusing on health sanitation and clean water in various districts throughout uganda. also the water school provide programs in uganda to reduce teenage pregnancy including…

—
11
The Hunger Project

Ongoing programs: the hunger project canada and in partnership with the global hunger project will carry out programs of the following regions: ending hunger in rural communities in africa india bangladesh mexico and peru through the…

—
12
Refugee Girls Worldwide

Maternal Health Program This program supports women and girls in accessing essential maternal sexual and reproductive health services. Food Protection Program This program provides refugee families with monthly food supplies to ensure…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Umoja Operation Compassion Society and the most unlike its peers is The Grove Retreat Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL CANADA — C$288,250 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetNorthwest Baptist Seminary — C$88,532 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetEQUIP CANADA — C$77,445 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetINNER HOPE — C$67,510 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetSPARTAN FOUNDATION — C$39,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetINVESTING HOPE — C$30,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetUMOJA — C$12,935 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTRINITY WESTERN UNIVERSITY — C$10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCANADIAN FOODGRAINS BANK ASSOCIATION INC — C$8,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE SEA PHILANTHROPY INC. — C$4,525 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCanadian Children's Shelter of Hope Foundation — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCALGARY PREGNANCY CARE CENTRE — C$1,010 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGROVE RETREAT SOCIETY — C$1,000 over 1y, 50% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Canadian National Christian FoundationON7.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Canadian National Christian Foundation · Nicola Wealth Private Giving Foundation · Abundance Canada · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 700283922:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Joyful Living Joyful Giving’s filings →