Carleton Place, ON · Charitable organization
Joseph Nama Ministries
1.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KENNETH COPELAND MINISTRIES | C$3,885 |
| LIVING FAITH CHURCH A.K.A. WINNERS CHAPEL INTERNATIONAL | C$3,435 |
| CHRIST FOR ALL NATIONS | C$1,500 |
| INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS AND JEWS | C$1,200 |
| BILL PRANKARD EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION | C$330 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$330 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- KCKENNETH COPELAND MINISTRIES7× · 2017–2024 · C$21k · revenue -20%
- LFLIVING FAITH CHURCH A. K. A. WINNERS' CHAPEL INTERNATIONAL7× · 2018–2024 · C$18k
- IFINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS AND JEWS5× · 2020–2024 · C$5k · revenue +28%
Funded once
- KCKenneth Copeland Ministryone grant, 2018 · C$4k
- LFLiving Faith Church a.k.a. Winners' Chapel Internationalone grant, 2017 · C$2k
- CFCALDWELL FAMILY CENTREgraduatedone grant, 2020 · C$100 · revenue +44%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.