Skip to content

Vancouver, BC · Private foundation

Johnny Fong Charitable Foundation

Various donations to charity for relief of poverty advancement of education and the advancement of other charitable purposes which benefit the community as a whole.

C$89k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k1 grant · C$9k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$30k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$50k
C$30,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$54k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
S.U.C.C.E.S.S.C$50,000
RICHMOND HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONC$30,000
S.U.C.C.E.S.S.C$8,880
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$733k · 4 repeat orgsC$42k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +146% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
4

Total granted

C$733k
C$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+146%
+39%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    S.U.C.C.E.S.S. Foundation
    6× · 2017–2024 · C$523k · revenue +73%
  • CC
    Chinese Cultural Centre of Greater Toronto Foundation
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$120k · revenue ×61
  • RH
    RICHMOND HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2024 · C$80k · revenue +91%

Funded once

  • CC
    CHINESE CANADIAN MUSEUM SOCIETY OF BC
    one grant, 2023 · C$20k
  • CH
    Chi Heng Foundation Canadagraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$10k · revenue +41%
  • CC
    Canadian Cancer Society
    one grant, 2017 · C$9k · revenue +6%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bc Cancer Foundation

The bc cancer foundation is the fundraising partner of bc cancer and the largest charitable funder of cancer research in this province. we enable donors to make contributions to leading-edge research that has a direct impact on…

—
2
Chinese Canadian Scholarship Foundation
—
3
Canadian Cancer Prevention Centre Foundation

Raising funds for ccs prevention centre in vancouver b.c.

—
4
Chinese Canadian Charitable Foundation
—
5
Calgary Chinatown Seniors' Centre Foundation
—
6
Victoria Chinatown Care Society

The main objective of the society is the provision of long-term care services from its facility in victoria british columbia.

—
7
Chinese Canadian Heritage and Future Foundation

(a) To advance education by conducting research on Chinese Canadian history and publicallydisseminating the results; (b) To advance education by providing scholarships to post-secondary students to encourage academicexcellence; and (c) To…

—
8
Canada Chinese Computer Association Charitable Foundation

The foundation receives an annual donation from the canada chinese computer association a non-for-profit organization. the foundation makes donations to other registered charities.

—
9
Chilliwack Hospital Foundation

The foundation raises funds to support programs and services that educate and facilitate better health for the residents in the region primarily through community based projects. programs focus on identifying the factors that have a…

—
10
Victoria Chinatown Care Foundation

To encourage and receive legacies donations bequests and endowments and to administer these funds in accordance with the wishes of the donors in order to fund and promote the provision of community care by furthering the aims of the…

—
11
The Vancouver Chinatown Lions Medical and Scholarship Foundation
—
12
Victoria Chinatown Museum Society

We operate programs to preserve and share the history of victoria's chinatown and the contributions of chinese canadian pioneers. these includes curating exhibits offering educational tours and hosting comunity events to promote cultural…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chinese Cultural Centre of Greater Toronto Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Villa Cathay Care Home Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetS.U.C.C.E.S.S. Foundation — C$522,880 over 6y, 15% of budgetChinese Cultural Centre of Greater Toronto Foundation — C$120,000 over 2y, 9.0% of budgetRICHMOND HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$80,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCHINESE CANADIAN MUSEUM SOCIETY OF BC — C$20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetVilla Cathay Care Home Society — C$10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChi Heng Foundation Canada — C$10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCanadian Cancer Society — C$8,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlzheimer Society — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chan Better World FoundationBC8.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chan Better World Foundation · Aqueduct Foundation · Vancouver Foundation · Bc Government Employees Community Services Fund Trust · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · Charities Aid Foundation Canada · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 830666772:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Johnny Fong’s filings →