Vancouver, BC · Private foundation
Johnny Fong Charitable Foundation
Various donations to charity for relief of poverty advancement of education and the advancement of other charitable purposes which benefit the community as a whole.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k1 grant · C$9k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$30k
- C$50k–250k1 grant · C$50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| S.U.C.C.E.S.S. | C$50,000 |
| RICHMOND HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | C$30,000 |
| S.U.C.C.E.S.S. | C$8,880 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +146% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- SFS.U.C.C.E.S.S. Foundation6× · 2017–2024 · C$523k · revenue +73%
- CCChinese Cultural Centre of Greater Toronto Foundation2× · 2017–2018 · C$120k · revenue ×61
- RHRICHMOND HOSPITAL FOUNDATION2× · 2020–2024 · C$80k · revenue +91%
Funded once
- CCCHINESE CANADIAN MUSEUM SOCIETY OF BCone grant, 2023 · C$20k
- CHChi Heng Foundation Canadagraduatedone grant, 2017 · C$10k · revenue +41%
- CCCanadian Cancer Societyone grant, 2017 · C$9k · revenue +6%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bc cancer foundation is the fundraising partner of bc cancer and the largest charitable funder of cancer research in this province. we enable donors to make contributions to leading-edge research that has a direct impact on…
Raising funds for ccs prevention centre in vancouver b.c.
The main objective of the society is the provision of long-term care services from its facility in victoria british columbia.
(a) To advance education by conducting research on Chinese Canadian history and publicallydisseminating the results; (b) To advance education by providing scholarships to post-secondary students to encourage academicexcellence; and (c) To…
The foundation receives an annual donation from the canada chinese computer association a non-for-profit organization. the foundation makes donations to other registered charities.
The foundation raises funds to support programs and services that educate and facilitate better health for the residents in the region primarily through community based projects. programs focus on identifying the factors that have a…
To encourage and receive legacies donations bequests and endowments and to administer these funds in accordance with the wishes of the donors in order to fund and promote the provision of community care by furthering the aims of the…
We operate programs to preserve and share the history of victoria's chinatown and the contributions of chinese canadian pioneers. these includes curating exhibits offering educational tours and hosting comunity events to promote cultural…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chinese Cultural Centre of Greater Toronto Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Villa Cathay Care Home Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds S.U.C.C.E.S.S. Foundation ↗
- Who funds Chinese Cultural Centre of Greater Toronto Foundation ↗
- Who funds RICHMOND HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHINESE CANADIAN MUSEUM SOCIETY OF BC ↗
- Who funds Villa Cathay Care Home Society ↗
- Who funds Chi Heng Foundation Canada ↗
- Who funds Canadian Cancer Society ↗
- Who funds Alzheimer Society ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Chan Better World Foundation · Aqueduct Foundation · Vancouver Foundation · Bc Government Employees Community Services Fund Trust · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · Charities Aid Foundation Canada · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.