Skip to content
Canadian charities

Tottenham, ON · Private foundation

Jo-Na Foundation

Foundation distributes donations to qualified donees only and has no charitable activity beyond making such donations.

C$35k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$10k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k5 grants · C$25k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$10k
C$5,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$75k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATIONC$10,000
SOUTHLAKE REGIONAL HEALTH CENTREC$7,500
MATTHEWS HOUSE HOSPICEC$5,000
RVH FOUNDATIONC$5,000
OUR TOWN BANK TOTTENHAMC$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIOC$2,500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$171k · 7 repeat orgsC$8k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
2

Total granted

C$171k
C$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+20%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • WO
    WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · C$50k · revenue +104%
  • OT
    OUR TOWN FOOD BANK TOTTENHAM
    5× · 2020–2024 · C$34k · revenue +118%
  • MH
    MATTHEWS HOUSE HOSPICE
    5× · 2020–2024 · C$23k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • BM
    BARRIE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · C$5k · revenue +20%
  • SM
    SIMCOE MUSKOKA FAMILY CONNECTIONS
    one grant, 2020 · C$3k · revenue -3%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Ottawa Hospital Foundation

The ottawa hospital foundation raises and grants funds to the ottawa hospital foundation and the ottawa hospital research institute and other qaulified donees for the purposes of improving patient care capital dvelopment medical research…

—
2
Windsor Regional Hospital Foundation

The foundation collects and administers funds on behalf of windsor regional hospital

—
3
Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre

Public hospital located in Barrie Ontario Canada

—
4
Orillia Soldiers' Memorial Hospital Foundation

The foundation is principally involved in raising funds for the benefit of orillias soldiers' memorial hospital. the foundation raises funds for medical equipment and technology infrastructure upgrades and expansions and education and…

—
5
Peterborough Regional Health Centre Foundation

The Peterborough Regional Health Centre Foundation raises funds and manages donor gifts for the purpose of supporting outstanding patient care at the Peterborough Regional Health Centre. This includes raising funds for identified capital…

—
6
Erie Shores Health Foundation

Erie shores health foundation raises capital for new equipment and building infrastructure for erie shores healthcare; capital campaigns currently being supported include diagnostic imaging mri equipment and urology. erie shores health…

—
7
Kootenay Lake Hospital Foundation

Kootenay lake hospital foundation raises funds to purchase priority medical equipment for the kootenay lake hospital

—
8
South Huron Hospital Foundation

Raise funds for improvement of health care services in the area served by south huron hospital

—
9
Women's College Hospital Foundation

Women's college hospital foundation raises funds to support the building equipment research and education needs of women's college hospital ontario's first and only independent academic ambulatory care hospital with a primary focus on…

—
10
Brant Community Healthcare System Foundation

Fund raised are for designated and capital projects and patient equipment for the brant community healthcare system brantford general hospital and the willett hospital sites

—
11
Joseph Brant Hospital Foundation

The Joseph Brant Hospital Foundation solicits maintains and grants funds to enhance and/or improve the facilities and services of the Joseph Brant Hospital.

—
12
Hamilton Health Sciences Foundation

Raise manage and distribute funds in support of our hospitals and cancer centre for patient care research education equipment renovations and capital expenditures.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Barrie Memorial Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Our Town Food Bank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWILLIAM OSLER HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION — C$50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOUR TOWN FOOD BANK TOTTENHAM — C$33,500 over 5y, 7.8% of budgetMATTHEWS HOUSE HOSPICE — C$22,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHLAKE REGIONAL HEALTH CENTRE — C$20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHOLY TRINITY RC CHURCH — C$20,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO — C$12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHLAKE REGIONAL HEALTH CENTRE — C$12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBARRIE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$5,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetSIMCOE MUSKOKA FAMILY CONNECTIONS — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
United Way of Greater TorontoON5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 705551281:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Jo-Na’s filings →