Manotick, ON · Private foundation
Jindal Foundation
Assess appropriate qualified donees to receive payment from foundation.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k1 grant · C$5k
- C$10k–50k2 grants · C$46k
- C$250k+1 grant · C$450k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OTTAWA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | C$450,000 |
| EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF CANADA | C$30,000 |
| HINDU TEMPLE OF OTTAWA-CARLETON INC. | C$16,000 |
| CHINMAYA BHARATI | C$5,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- OHOTTAWA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION3× · 2022–2024 · C$850k · revenue +34%
- HTHINDU TEMPLE OF OTTAWA-CARLETON INC.8× · 2017–2024 · C$830k · revenue +50% · 47% of their budget
- EVEKAI VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF CANADA6× · 2019–2024 · C$147k · revenue +82%
Funded once
- SSSRI SATHYA SAI SPIRITUAL CENTRE (OTTAWA-CARLETON)graduatedone grant, 2018 · C$5k · revenue +215%
- ICINDO-CANADIAN COMMUNITY CENTRE INC.one grant, 2018 · C$2k · revenue -24%
- SOSHEPHERDS OF GOOD HOPEone grant, 2021 · C$1k · revenue -3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1. Religious Discourses 2. Celebrating Hindu Religious events
Chaf is here to serve the communities enlighten the youth about cultures render service to new immigrants seniors and unemployed without discrimination.
The primary purpose of the organization is to direct activities towards preserving and fostering hindu religious philosophical heritage nad enriching the multicultural base of canadian society. the charity celebrates different cultural and…
To advance education by providing financial assistance scholarships and bursaries to students at the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Madras (India). To promote Health by providing financial assistance to students at IIT Madras who…
1) hospital support in canada 2) food supplies in canada 3) help/shelter/food/oxygen equipement 4) discourses for well being 5) mental health & global peace
Working in the fund raising mode to sponsor projects in Canada and India.
Support the university of ottawa heart foundation
Providing Ritual Services. Host Cultural and Religious Events. Advance Religion by Preaching the Teachings.
Autumn festival and other ceremonies (durga puja lakshmi puja saraswati puja) and cultural activities associated with each ceremony complying with hindu rites rituals and customs in the ottawa region. these activities take place in…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Ottawa Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Carleton University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OTTAWA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HINDU TEMPLE OF OTTAWA-CARLETON INC. ↗
- Who funds EKAI VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds CHINMAYA BHARATI ↗
- Who funds SRI SATHYA SAI SPIRITUAL CENTRE (OTTAWA-CARLETON) ↗
- Who funds INDO-CANADIAN COMMUNITY CENTRE INC. ↗
- Who funds HINDU FEDERATION ↗
- Who funds SHEPHERDS OF GOOD HOPE ↗
- Who funds OTTAWA FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Ottawa Rotary Home Foundation ↗
- Who funds Carleton University ↗
- Who funds MONTFORT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Singhal Family Foundation · Wcpd Foundation · Mona & Nav Aggarwal Foundation · Ottawa Community Foundation / Fondation Communautaire d'Ottawa · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · Aqueduct Foundation · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.