Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

North York, ON · Charitable organization

Jdrf Canadian Clinical Trial Network

Cctn creates a strong clinical research network to develop and conduct leading-edge clinical trials into type 1 diabetes and its complications in order to accelerate delivery of the benefits of research advances to the community.

C$225k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$225k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$225,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$836k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The University of British ColumbiaC$225,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$4.8M · 4 repeat orgsC$70k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
3

Total granted

C$4.8M
C$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+32%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$2.7M · revenue +55%
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA
    4× · 2017–2022 · C$1.1M · revenue ×1,050 · 32% of their budget
  • JD
    JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION CANADA
    3× · 2017–2021 · C$718k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF EASTERN ONTARIOgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$30k · revenue +138%
  • CR
    CHEO RESEARCH INSTITUTEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$30k · revenue +32%
  • MS
    MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2018 · C$10k · revenue -47%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field
02the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA — C$2,654,156 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA — C$1,050,000 over 4y, 32% of budgetJUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION CANADA — C$717,615 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK — C$367,951 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF EASTERN ONTARIO(CHEO) — C$30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHEO RESEARCH INSTITUTE — C$30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under research.

Source object 812584068:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Jdrf Canadian Clinical Trial Network’s filings →