Skip to content

Toronto, ON · Charitable organization

Jazz.Fm91 Inc.

Jazz.FM91: • Operates a 24/7 all jazz FM radio broadcasting station on a non-profit basis that provides radio programming designed to enrich the general public’s understanding and appreciation of jazz music and the arts.

C$13k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$4k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$3,800
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of TorontoC$3,800
York UniversityC$3,800
Humber CollegeC$2,600
Mohawk College FoundationC$2,300
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$102k · 6 repeat orgsC$6k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
3

Total granted

C$102k
C$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+4%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • YU
    YORK UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$19k · revenue +22%
  • UO
    University of Toronto
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$18k · revenue +43%
  • RP
    REGENT PARK SCHOOL OF MUSIC
    3× · 2017–2019 · C$9k · revenue +150%

Funded once

  • UB
    Unison Benevolent Fund
    one grant, 2020 · C$5k · revenue -7%
  • SW
    Simon Wiesenthal Centregraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$500 · revenue +51%
  • MS
    Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada
    one grant, 2022 · C$250 · revenue +4%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uts Foundation

Developing and maintaining funds to assist the students of university of toronto schools by providing scholarships fellowships bursaries and financial assistance.

—
2
York University Foundation - Fondation De L'universite York
—
3
The Humber College Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning

The humber college institute of technology and advanced learning is a publicly assisted polytechnic educational institution that offers bachelor degrees diplomas and postgraduate certificates in more than 220 full-time programs and over…

—
4
Uhn Foundation

We raise fund for research education and the enhancement of patient care at Toronto General and Western hospitals as well as Toronto Rehabilitation Institute and Michener Institute of Education at UHN. Together with our donors we are…

—
5
The Sylva M. Gelber Music Foundation

Funds provided to assist students of music to further education and training

—
6
The Toronto Symphony Foundation

The Toronto Symphony Foundation (TSF) was incorporated to aid the Toronto Symphony in the advancement of Orchestral Music. The TSF receives administers and invests gifts and makes annual distributions to The Toronto Symphony.

—
7
The Dr. Charles H. Best Foundation

Provides scholarship funds for medical research at the university of toronto.

—
8
Uwc (Toronto) Foundation

To provide scholarships and financial awards to students with financial need.

—
9
The University of Winnipeg Foundation Inc.

The foundation receives donations from annual giving programs and other campaigns. Funds are gifted to the University of Winnipeg for education purposes (scholarships/bursaries) and for capital and capademic enhancement purposes.

—
10
The University of Manitoba

The University of Manitoba provides post-secondary education to undergraduate graduate and professional students. The University also conducts research in a broad array of academic disciplines. There are numerous educational and research…

—
11
Mount Sinai Hospital Otolaryngology Research Fund

Support of academic medical research education and health care in canada

—
12
Ocad University Foundation
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Mohawk College Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Unison Benevolent Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYORK UNIVERSITY — C$19,200 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Toronto — C$17,700 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMOHAWK COLLEGE — C$17,600 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetREGENT PARK SCHOOL OF MUSIC — C$8,750 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetUnison Benevolent Fund — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSimon Wiesenthal Centre — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMultiple Sclerosis Society of Canada — C$250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YORK UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of Toronto ↗
  • Who funds MOHAWK COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds REGENT PARK SCHOOL OF MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds Unison Benevolent Fund ↗
  • Who funds Simon Wiesenthal Centre ↗
  • Who funds Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligneAB3.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-08-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under support of schools and education.

Source object 118864826:2024-08-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Jazz.Fm91’s filings →