Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Rimouski, QC · Charitable organization

Jardins Commémoratifs Saint-Germain

Opération de cimetières d'un mausolée et d'un crématorium dans la ville de rimouski

C$2k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$1k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$300
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE DE SAINTE-CÉCILE DU BICC$1,100
FONDATION MAISON MARIE-ÉLISABETHC$300
PRÊT D'HONNEUR DE L'EST DU QUÉBECC$300
SOCIÉTÉ ALZHEIMER BAS-SAINT-LAURENTC$50
FONDATION DES MALADIES DU COEUR ET DE L'AVC DU CANADAC$50
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$15k · 8 repeat orgsC$3k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

C$15k
C$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+15%

Still filing today

63%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$400 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • FD
    FABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE DE SAINTE-CÉCILE DU BIC
    6× · 2017–2024 · C$4k · revenue +31%
  • FD
    FONDATION DU CENTRE RÉGIONAL DE SANTÉ ET DE SERVICES SOCIAUX
    2× · 2018–2020 · C$3k · revenue +52%
  • FM
    FONDATION MAISON MARIE-ÉLISABETH
    4× · 2021–2024 · C$2k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • LF
    LA FABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE DE LA BIENHEUREUSE ÉLISABETH-TURGgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$1k · revenue +126%
  • MR
    MOISSON RIMOUSKI- NEIGETTE
    one grant, 2020 · C$1k · revenue -66%
  • CB
    CENTRAIDE BAS-SAINT-LAURENTgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$300 · revenue +28%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Entraide Le Rameau De Rimouski
—
2
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-CÉSaire
—
3
La Fabrique De La Paroisse Du Tres-Saint-Redempteur
—
4
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Sauveur
—
5
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Sainte-Croix
—
6
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Viateur
—
7
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De St-Germain
—
8
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Marcel (L'islet)
—
9
La Fabrique De La Paroisse Sainte-Marguerite
—
10
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Notre-Dame-De-La-Salette
—
11
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Adelme
—
12
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Notre-Dame-Du-Royaume
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation SantÉ Rimouski and the most unlike its peers is Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada Fondation Des Maladies Du Coeur Et De L'avc Du Canada. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE DE SAINTE-CÉCILE DU BIC — C$3,820 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetARCHEVÊCHÉ DE RIMOUSKI — C$3,600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION DU CENTRE RÉGIONAL DE SANTÉ ET DE SERVICES SOCIAUX — C$3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION MAISON MARIE-ÉLISABETH — C$1,900 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLA FABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE DE LA BIENHEUREUSE ÉLISABETH-TURG — C$1,040 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMOISSON RIMOUSKI- NEIGETTE — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSociété canadienne du cancer — C$800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFondation du Club Rotary de Rimouski — C$600 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCENTRAIDE BAS-SAINT-LAURENT — C$300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRÊT D'HONNEUR DE L'EST DU QUÉBEC — C$300 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCENTRE DE PRÉVENTION DU SUICIDE ET D'INTERVENTION DE CRISE P — C$150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetL'ARBRE DE VIE DE RIMOUSKI INC. — C$100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFONDATION DES MALADIES DU COEUR ET DE L'AVC DU CANADA — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIÉTÉ ALZHEIMER BAS-SAINT-LAURENT — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oeuvres Caritatives D…Union Canadienne des …Centraide Québec Cha…Union Canadienne Des …Telus Employees Chari…United Way East Ontar…Canadian Online Givin…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadahelps Canadon
Oeuvres Caritatives Des Filles de Jesus CanadaQC11× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oeuvres Caritatives Des Filles de Jesus Canada · Union Canadienne des Moniales de l'Ordre de Sainte-Ursule · Centraide Québec Chaudière-Appalaches et Bas-Saint laurent · Union Canadienne Des Moniales de L'Ordre de Saint Ursule · Telus Employees Charitable Trust · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under public amenities.

Source object 122020803:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Jardins Commémoratifs Saint-Germain’s filings →