Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Toronto, ON · Charitable organization

J.F. of Canada

Donations distributed to local charities $45 300

C$45k
Granted FY2020
1
Grants FY2020
—
Regions reached
C$45k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2020 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$45,300
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$1k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHARREI SHOMAYIM SYNAGOUGEC$45,300
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$535k · 3 repeat orgsC$24k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2020, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
10

Total granted

C$535k
C$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
0%

Still filing today

100%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    SHARREI SHOMAYIM SYNAGOUGE
    4× · 2017–2020 · C$404k · revenue +2%
  • NZ
    NACHLAS ZVI YESHIVAH
    2× · 2017–2019 · C$90k · revenue +62%
  • BY
    BAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    3× · 2017–2019 · C$40k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • CF
    CHABAD FLAMINGO
    one grant, 2018 · C$8k · revenue -41%
  • CF
    C F OF YESHIVA BETH ABRAHAM
    one grant, 2018 · C$8k
  • YY
    Yeshiva Yesodai Hatorah
    one grant, 2017 · C$5k · revenue +11%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Gedolah Zichron Shmayahu

Maintained a religious school for the training and instruction of religious scholars maintained a house of worship in compliance with the requirements and practices of the jewish faith in the orthodox tradition.

—
2
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—
3
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
4
Yeshiva Ateres Yisroel

Operated an orthodox jewish high school geared to students who need and would benefit from individual attention not available in existing orthodox jewish high schools.

—
5
Kollel Toldos Yakov Yosef
—
6
Yeshiva Torah Temimah

The school educates high-school age male students in both secular and jewish studies in a non-conventional way offering more attention than normal to each student.

—
7
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
8
Yeshivah Toras Chaim

The charity provides scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to study at yeshiva toras chalm

—
9
Yeshiva Student Religious Education Fund

The organization has been set up to provide religious education.

—
10
Institute for Advanced Talmudic and Halachic Studies

Established and operated as an institution of jewish training and education particularly in the fields of rabbinic talmudic halachic studies.

—
11
Beth Hamedrash L'horaah

Operate a school for teaching religious studies

—
12
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshivat Yesodei Hatora and the most unlike its peers is Chevra Shas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSHARREI SHOMAYIM SYNAGOUGE — C$404,200 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetNACHLAS ZVI YESHIVAH — C$90,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetBAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY SCHOOL — C$40,410 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCHABAD FLAMINGO — C$7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYeshiva Yesodai Hatorah — C$5,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChevra Shas Congregation — C$1,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetBeth Oloth — C$790 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBnei Zion CF — C$500 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetC F of Toldos Aharon — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCRIB Canada — C$120 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMishkan Hatorah — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

My Charity FundZichron Binyomin Char…Canadahelps Canadon
My Charity FundON8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: My Charity Fund · Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2020-08-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2020. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under support of schools and education.

Source object 118974484:2020-08-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on J.F. of Canada’s filings →