Kitchener, ON · Charitable organization
International Gospel Centre
To preach and teach the gospel of jesus christ through regular meetings.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NEXO INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES | C$6,000 |
| THE PREGNANCY CENTRE | C$5,250 |
| SIM CANADA | C$2,400 |
| THE PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA BRITISH COLUMBIA | C$1,800 |
| FOUNTAIN OF HOPE MINISTRIES | C$500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$7k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- TPTHE PREGNANCY CENTRE8× · 2017–2024 · C$26k · revenue +148%
- NINEXO INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES3× · 2021–2023 · C$9k · revenue +11%
- TPTHE PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA4× · 2017–2020 · C$8k · revenue +22%
Funded once
- NINEXO INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIESone grant, 2024 · C$6k
- FOFOUNTAIN OF HOPE MINISTRIESone grant, 2024 · C$500 · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Teaching at conferences seminars retreats ywam schools and missions throughout the world.
Church ministry 1. worship god 2. evangelism 3. teaching and preaching the holy scripture 4. equip members and other related ministries of the gospel
(1) oversea and local missionaries (2) bible study (3) pastoral counselling and preaching
To gather christians for prayer and teachings through conferences. the ministry also provides individual with personal ministry.
Advance and promote the doctrine observances and practices of the Christian faith through: teaching and preaching the tenants and doctrines of the Christian faith; organizing executing participating and teaching in conferences workshops…
Missionary trainings On-line and On-site mission trips Church planting trainings
Advancing the Kingdom of God through Soul Winning evangelism outreaches and Church planting. Worship & bible study. Provides aid to Peace House International Satellite Churches in 5 countries. Provide aid to low-income persons. Counselling…
Licensing of pastors equipping training and empowering ministers giving support to humanitarian projects
Evangelistic services bible studies prayer services
Worship services bible studies prayer meetings overseas missions deliverance ministry.
Revive nations is a ministry with a passion to raise jesus lovers across the world and on a mission to win souls for jesus touching nations one life at a time.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sim Canada and the most unlike its peers is The Pregnancy Centre. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE PREGNANCY CENTRE ↗
- Who funds NEXO INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds THE PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds THE PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA BRITISH COLUMBIA AND YU ↗
- Who funds SIM CANADA ↗
- Who funds Teen Ranch Ministries ↗
- Who funds FIGHT4FREEDOM ↗
- Who funds FOUNTAIN OF HOPE MINISTRIES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.