Crossfield, AB · Charitable organization
Interact Ministries of Canada
We provide evangelism spiritual mentoring worship and prayer services for first nations south asian and arabic people groups.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Steinbach Bible College | C$500 |
| Millar College of the Bible | C$500 |
| Nipawin Bible College | C$500 |
| Prairie College | C$500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- SCSIM Canada4× · 2017–2020 · C$59k · revenue +30%
- NENATIVE EVANGELICAL FELLOWSHIP OF CANADA INC3× · 2017–2023 · C$7k · revenue +158%
- MCMILLAR COLLEGE OF THE BIBLE8× · 2017–2024 · C$4k · revenue +84%
Funded once
- NANORTH AMERICAN INDIGENOUS MINISTRIESone grant, 2023 · C$500 · revenue +3%
- AMAvant Ministriesone grant, 2019 · C$423 · revenue +5%
- AIAction International Ministriesone grant, 2019 · C$150 · revenue -3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Training for christian ministry through undergraduate and graduate training.
Alberta bible college is a post secondary educational institution awarding four-year degrees two-year diplomas and one-year certificates in christian ministries. a two-year degree completion program in christian leadership or counselling…
Missionary training -bible studies
Through post-secondary education programs columbia bible college equips people for a life of discipleship ministry and leadership in service to the church and community. programs include one-year certificates two-year diplomas and bachelor…
Promote the word of god and to aid in spreading the gospel of jesus christ to the end of the earth. we challenge and assist people to minister to the unreached. we participate in conferences at churches bible colleges and universities for…
Development of courses and programs
Provide academic training for the ministry of the gospel
Bible college for canadian and international students
Our mission is to support and partner with Christian churches and relief organizations around the world to share our faith disciple teach train and serve. We focus on Church Planting & Evangelism Relief & Development and Leadership…
Christian University Education
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Native Evangelical Fellowship of Canada Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rock of Ages Bible Camp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SIM Canada ↗
- Who funds NATIVE EVANGELICAL FELLOWSHIP OF CANADA INC ↗
- Who funds MILLAR COLLEGE OF THE BIBLE ↗
- Who funds PRAIRIE BIBLE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds PEACE RIVER BIBLE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds STEINBACK BIBLE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Nipawin Bible College ↗
- Who funds ROCK OF AGES BIBLE CAMP ↗
- Who funds NORTH AMERICAN INDIGENOUS MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Avant Ministries ↗
- Who funds Action International Ministries ↗
- Who funds Canadian Council of Christian Charities ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Abundance Canada · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.