Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Montreal, QC · Charitable organization

Institut économique de montréal

Par nos interventions nous alimentons les débats sur les politiques publiques au québec et au canada en étudiant des réformes créatrices de richesse.

C$2k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$711
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$493
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipientC$711
UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL / RÉSEAU DIPLÔMÉS ET DES DONATEURSC$500
ATLAS NETWORKC$493
THE BLACK WATCH OF CANADA FOUNDATIONC$266
PORTE-PAROLEC$230
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 87% of grant dollars (C$8k). The 13% that went abroad (C$1k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 13% of all-years giving (C$1k)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your field
03the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
3/7
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJUSTICE CENTRE FOR CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOMS — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANADA COMPANY — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR LIBERA STUDIES INC. — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL / RÉSEAU DIPLÔMÉS ET DES DONATEURS — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPORTE-PAROLE — C$430 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BLACK WATCH OF CANADA FOUNDATION — C$266 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCROIX ROUGE CANADIENNE — C$210 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ottawa Community Foun…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
Ottawa Community Foundation / Fondation Communautaire d'OttawaON7.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ottawa Community Foundation / Fondation Communautaire d'Ottawa · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under research.

Source object 876185877:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Institut économique de montréal’s filings →