Richmond, BC · Charitable organization
India Cultural Centre of Canada Gurdwara Nanak Niwas Society
Major source of revenues are temple services and donations.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under C$10k4 grants · C$4k
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$37k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MANMEET SINGH BHULLAR CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | C$37,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA | C$2,100 |
| TEAM CANADA SOCIETY | C$1,200 |
| RICHMOND CHRISTMAS FUND | C$500 |
| SANJHA VEHRA WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION | C$500 |
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Promotion of Punjabi Language
Provide assistance to needy members of the sikh community - scholarship programs for the post secondary education - provide information for the awareness of the sikh religion
New programs
Donate to other charities and foundations Donate to Disaster Relief Health and Welfare Donate to Educational .Cultural and other such charitable causes
Organize and provide religious educational and social activites for the sikh community
The Charity was only active for the part of the year (May) We have worked with Nishkam New Delhi NGO to award scholarships to Indian students going to colleges and universities. We have provided $35095.05 CAD to disburse eligible needy…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Khalsa Diwan Society and the most unlike its peers is University of British Columbia. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MANMEET SINGH BHULLAR CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Canada Ukraine Foundation ↗
- Who funds Nargis Dutt Cancer Foundation ↗
- Who funds Guru Nanak Modi Khana Food Bank Society ↗
- Who funds KHALSA DIWAN SOCIETY VANCOUVER ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA ↗
- Who funds Ronale Sanjay Naidu Foundation ↗
- Who funds RICHMOND CHRISTMAS FUND ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation Canada · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.