St Thomas, ON · Charitable organization
Impacting Asia Ministries
To raise funds in canada and transfer funds to thailand to operate a bible school in thailand.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GLOBAL GOOD NEWS INITIATIVE | C$2,940 |
| HOUSE OF REFUGE STREET MINISTRIES | C$2,940 |
| ISRAEL'S PEACE MINISTRIES | C$2,940 |
| MINISTERS NETWORK CANADA | C$2,940 |
| KENNETH COPELAND MINISTRIES | C$1,415 |
| CAPITAL CITY CHURCH CANADA | C$715 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- OBOPEN BIBLE FAITH FELLOWSHIP8× · 2017–2024 · C$23k · revenue +18%
- IPISRAEL'S PEACE MINISTRIES8× · 2017–2024 · C$23k · revenue +16%
- GGGLOBAL GOOD NEWS INITIATIVE7× · 2018–2024 · C$13k · revenue +215%
Funded once
- DCDream Centre Ministriesgraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$500 · revenue +93%
- TDTHIRD DAY WORSHIP CENTREone grant, 2019 · C$500 · revenue -29%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
(1) oversea and local missionaries (2) bible study (3) pastoral counselling and preaching
Missionary trainings On-line and On-site mission trips Church planting trainings
Developing ministries and christian leadership by training pastors and lay workers funding missionary outreach program including attendance by chairman in countries where mission work is done
Teaching at conferences seminars retreats ywam schools and missions throughout the world.
To gather christians for prayer and teachings through conferences. the ministry also provides individual with personal ministry.
Planting churches training and coaching pastors training elders resourcing churches
The organization provides retreats counselling and teaching to Pastors Missionaries and Churches in Canada
Licensing of pastors equipping training and empowering ministers giving support to humanitarian projects
International Christian Ministries (ICM) trains and equips Christian leaders in Africa Eastern Europe and Latin America with and through its agents. These training initiatives include various Christian seminars and conferences facilitating…
Training qualified leaders from around world to effectively evangelize other national christians.
Bible teaching guest speaker spiritual counselling
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ministers Network Canada and the most unlike its peers is Israel's Peace Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OPEN BIBLE FAITH FELLOWSHIP ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL'S PEACE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN FELLOWSHIP OF CHURCHES AND MINISTERS INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL GOOD NEWS INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF REFUGE STREET MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds KENNETH COPELAND MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL CITY CHURCH CANADA ↗
- Who funds Dream Centre Ministries ↗
- Who funds THIRD DAY WORSHIP CENTRE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ministers Network Canada · Centralia Faith Tabernacle · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.