Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Winnipeg, MB · Charitable organization

Immanual United Church

1.

C$37k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$15k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k14 grants · C$11k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$26k
C$632
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$989k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
United Church of CanadaC$15,128
United Church of CanadaC$11,060
1 Just CityC$2,984
Children's Heritage Education Endowment FundC$1,400
Children's Heritage Education Endowment Fund (R E School)C$1,072
1 Just CityC$1,025
Harvest ManitobaC$895
Interfaith ImmigrationC$632
Salvation ArmyC$610
Harvest ManitobaC$450
Interfaith ImmigrationC$400
Agape TableC$400
LITE (Local Investment Toward Employment)C$350
Local Investment Toward EmploymentC$350
Canadian Foodgrains BankC$350
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$208k · 14 repeat orgsC$20k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +73% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
8

Total granted

C$208k
C$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+73%
+3%

Still filing today

79%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    United Church of Canada
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$142k · revenue +22%
  • CH
    Children's Heritage Education Endowment Fund
    6× · 2019–2024 · C$7k · revenue +21%
  • HM
    Harvest Manitoba
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$7k · revenue +176%

Funded once

  • NC
    National Centre for Truth & Reconciliation
    one grant, 2023 · C$12k · revenue +12%
  • NE
    North End Community Ministry
    one grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue -97%
  • CF
    Christian Family Centre
    one grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue -4%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
End Homelessness Winnipeg Inc.

To bring together all sectors of our community to work with people who are experiencing homelessness so that together we can prevent homelessness support recovery and wellbeing find suitable housing and measure our success in ways that…

—
2
Fh Canada

Food for the Hungry (FH) Canada part of the global FH family is a Christian not-for-profit organization dedicated to ending poverty worldwide. With partners across Canada and the world FH walks alongside vulnerable communities throughout…

—
3
Manitoba Food Charter Inc.

To work with people in manitoba to increase opportunities for people to eat good food

—
4
OneMeal Inc.

Prepares and gives out food packages to homeless people in toronto

—
5
Strategic Ministry Partnerships - Canada

Relieving poverty in developing nations by providing food and other necessities of life including access to education for children of families who are poor of low income or in need.

—
6
United Way of Winnipeg

1. provide social service programs and services to citizens; 2. support and fund the creation growth and maintenance of community economic development activities that address the root cause of issues; 3. support and fund the creation…

—
7
Mennonite Central Committee Manitoba Inc.

Mennonite Central Committee (MCC) is a global non-profit organization that strives to share God's love and compassion through relief development and peacebuilding. MCC Manitoba supports the international relief development and peace…

—
8
Food for the Poor of Canada Inc

Food for the poor-canada is a faith-based organization dedicated to alleviating poverty in latin america and the caribbean. our humanitarian aid provides resources such as food housing and clean water. we also focus on supporting…

—
9
Islamic Relief - Ir Canada

Islamic Relief Canada carries out humanitarian and development programs in over 30 countries. Programs include: • Livelihoods focused on climate-adaptive support and/or economic empowerment; • Health including water sanitation and hygiene…

—
10
Unity United Church

Inited church of canada programs and policies

—
11
Child Nutrition Council of Manitoba Inc.

Facilitate the operation of school and community-based nourishment progams including 398 sites and involving over 55 000 children and youth throughout manitoba especially in areas of vulnerable populations; - review annual applications…

—
12
Mealshare Aid Foundation

Gifts to qualified donees education related to hunger and relief of poverty. creating an agency agreement with mealshare and society to provide education related to hunger and to provide the mealshare program specifically to create and…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Harvest Manitoba Inc. and the most unlike its peers is The University of Manitoba. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUnited Church of Canada — C$142,410 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNational Centre for Truth & Reconciliation — C$11,734 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Heritage Education Endowment Fund — C$7,272 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHarvest Manitoba — C$6,955 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetManitoba Interfaith Immigration Council — C$6,245 over 8y, 0.1% of budget1 Just City — C$3,002 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAgape Table — C$2,875 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLITE (Local Investment Toward Employment) — C$2,257 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetSalvation Army — C$1,740 over 6y, 0.4% of budget1 Just City — C$1,647 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNorth End Community Ministry — C$1,400 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetChristian Family Centre — C$1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCanadian Foodgrains Bank — C$735 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmnesty International — C$225 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAffirm United — C$200 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHealing Forest c/o John's Anglican Cathedral — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds United Church of Canada ↗
  • Who funds National Centre for Truth & Reconciliation ↗
  • Who funds Children's Heritage Education Endowment Fund ↗
  • Who funds Harvest Manitoba ↗
  • Who funds Manitoba Interfaith Immigration Council ↗
  • Who funds 1 Just City ↗
  • Who funds Agape Table ↗
  • Who funds LITE (Local Investment Toward Employment) ↗
  • Who funds Salvation Army ↗
  • Who funds 1 Just City ↗
  • Who funds North End Community Ministry ↗
  • Who funds Christian Family Centre ↗
  • Who funds Canadian Foodgrains Bank ↗
  • Who funds Amnesty International ↗
  • Who funds Affirm United ↗
  • Who funds Healing Forest c/o John's Anglican Cathedral ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Winnipeg Foundati…First Unitarian Unive…All Charities CampaignThe Jewish Foundation…Abundance CanadaStrategic Charitable …Charitable Gift Funds…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
The Winnipeg FoundationMB9.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Winnipeg Foundation · First Unitarian Universalist Church of Winnipeg Inc · All Charities Campaign · The Jewish Foundation of Manitoba · Abundance Canada · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 129950580:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Immanual United Church’s filings →