Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Ilderton, ON · Charitable organization

Ilderton Agricultural Society

We have over 250 members who carry out more than 1500 hours per year in order to deliver our programs.

C$6k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$3k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$500
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AILSA CRAIG & AREA FOOD BANK & THRIFT STOREC$3,101
MIDDLESEX 4H ASSOCIATIONC$916
GIRL GUIDES OF CANADAC$700
JUNIOR FARMERS ASSOCIATION OF ONTARIOC$500
CANADIAN NATIONAL EXHIBITIONC$500
ILDERTON LIONS CHARITABLE TRUSTC$363
ONTARIO HOLSTEIN DAIRY YOUTH TRUST FUNDC$250
ST GEORGES PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHC$50
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$26k · 6 repeat orgsC$6k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +91% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
17

Total granted

C$26k
C$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+91%
+4%

Still filing today

100%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • M4
    MIDDLESEX 44 ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2017–2024 · C$8k · revenue +91%
  • AC
    AILSA CRAIG & AREA FOODBANK & THRIFT STORE
    4× · 2020–2024 · C$8k · revenue +10%
  • OH
    ONTARIO HOLSTEIN DAIRY YOUTH TRUST FUND
    3× · 2019–2024 · C$6k · revenue +236%

Funded once

  • O4
    ONTARIO 4-H COUNCIL
    one grant, 2022 · C$852 · revenue +6%
  • AC
    AILSA CRAIG & AREA FOOD BANK & THRIFT STORE
    one grant, 2019 · C$708
  • AC
    ANSHAWE COLLEGE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$500 · revenue +133%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ontario 4-H Foundation

The program's mandate is to receive and manage endowment funds and to encourage on-going partnerships for core program activities in an effort to ensure the long term sustainability of 4-h in ontario.

—
2
Durham East 4-H Council

We provide youth age 6 to 21 with leadership opportunities and skill sets. Members participated in local regional and provincial activities throughout the year.

—
3
Canadian 4-H Council

Organize and coordinate national and international conferences exchanges and scholarships which focus on citizenship leadership development career choices technology and other pressing issues being faced by today's rural communities and…

—
4
Oxford County 4-H Association

Youth programs - clubs for members teaching hands on and leadership skills

—
5
Haldimand 4-H Association

Haldimand 4-H is a youth development programme offered in a club format for ages 6 to 21. We had over 45 volunteers. The topics included animal clubs; dairy beef rabbit and miniature horse along with life skills clubs such as cooking…

—
6
Colchester and District Agricultural Society

Leadership-scholarships promote agriculture-horse show drill team

—
7
Royal Agricultural Winter Fair Association of Canada

The Royal Agricultural Winter Fair j('The Royal') is recognized as the pre-eminent organization for presenting and promoting excellence in Canadian agriculture food and equestrian activities through world-class competition commerce…

—
8
London Health Sciences Foundation

Fundraising programs provide funding for the enhancement of patient care research education and capital projects for London Health Sciences Centre.

—
9
Waterloo Region 4-H Association

Waterloo 4-h operated 12 projects in 2024 with 126 members and 45 volunteers. we welcomed 28 new members and 8 new volunteers. we offer youth between the ages of 6 and 21 the opportunity to grow through leadership development programs both…

—
10
Canadian Agri-Food Foundation
—
11
York Region 4-H Association

York region 4h offer's programs to youth 6-21. these programs foster personal development and skills through clubs and activities. there are apporimaley 70 youth member registered and 20 adult volunteers (dairy cooking rabbit sheep goat…

—
12
Canadian Nutrition Society Food for Health Foundation
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ontario 4-H Council and the most unlike its peers is Bryanston United Church. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMIDDLESEX 44 ASSOCIATION — C$8,285 over 6y, 8.3% of budgetAILSA CRAIG & AREA FOODBANK & THRIFT STORE — C$7,567 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetONTARIO HOLSTEIN DAIRY YOUTH TRUST FUND — C$5,750 over 3y, 6.8% of budgetCanadian National Exhibition — C$2,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetMIDDLESEX CENTER ARCHIVES — C$1,200 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetONTARIO 4-H COUNCIL — C$852 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR FARMERS ASSOCIATION OF ONTARIO — C$800 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetGIRL GUIDES OF CANADA — C$700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANSHAWE COLLEGE FOUNDATION — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNTRY HERITAGE AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES CANADA — C$400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetILDERTON LIONS CHARITABLE TRUST — C$363 over 1y, 30% of budgetHome County Folk League — C$264 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Health Foundation — C$250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSouthwestern Ontario Childrens Care Inc — C$250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL ABILITY RIDING INSTITUTE — C$162 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEPILEPSY LONDON & AREA — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRYANSTON UNITED CHURCH — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMultiple Sclerosis Society of Canada — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCanadian Cancer Society — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER SOCIETY OF ONTARIO — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

London Community Foun…Mowbray and Doris Sif…United Way Elgin Midd…My Tribute Gift Found…Abundance CanadaRbc Foundation/Rbc Fo…Strategic Charitable …Charities Aid Foundat…Charitable Gift Funds…United Way of Greater…CHIMP: Charitable Imp…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…
London Community FoundationON10.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: London Community Foundation · Mowbray and Doris Sifton Family Foundation · United Way Elgin Middlesex · My Tribute Gift Foundation · Abundance Canada · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation Canada · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · United Way of Greater Toronto · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · PayPal Giving Fund Canada

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-11-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under teaching institutions.

Source object 118966415:2024-11-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Ilderton Agricultural Society’s filings →