Scarborough, ON · Charitable organization
Iglesia Ni Cristo
Conducting daily bible studies in english ; frequentlyholds missionary and evangelical missions both in person and online.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- C$50k–250k1 grant · C$150k
- C$250k+2 grants · C$2.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| IGLESIA NI CRISTO ( CHURCH OF CHRIST IN ALBERTA) | C$2,089,000 |
| FELIX Y. MANALO FOUNDATION INC | C$733,642 |
| IGLESIA NI CHRISTO ' CHURCH OF CHRIST MANITOBA INC | C$150,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- FMFELIX MANALO FOUNDATION INC.8× · 2017–2024 · C$4.8M · revenue +565% · 100% of their budget
- INIGLESIA NI CRISTO ( CHURCH OF CHRIST IN ALBERTA)6× · 2019–2024 · C$4.7M · revenue +58%
- EDEGLIS DU CHRIST (MONTREAL) IGLESIA NI CRISTO (MONTREAL)3× · 2021–2023 · C$2.3M · revenue +17%
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.