Skip to content

Toronto, ON · Public foundation

ICSC Foundation Canada

The ICSC Foundation Canada( '' foundation ) advances education by providing bursaries scholarships awards and other financials assistance educational and professional resources and mentorship and internship opportunities and programs to secondary and post-secondary students enrolled in canadian high school university or…

C$26k
Granted FY2023
4
Grants FY2023
3
Regions reached
C$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2023 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under C$10k3 grants · C$16k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$10k
C$7,500
Median grant
3
Regions reached
C$912k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF GUELPHC$10,000
TORONTO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITYC$7,500
UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIAC$4,500
MCGILL UNIVERSITYC$3,500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$123k · 4 repeat orgsC$20k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against -16% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
2

Total granted

C$123k
C$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
-16%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • RU
    RYERSON UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2018–2023 · C$63k · revenue +32%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH
    5× · 2019–2023 · C$35k · revenue +12%
  • MU
    MCGILL UNIVRSITY
    4× · 2020–2023 · C$14k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • UW
    United Way of Greater Victoria
    one grant, 2018 · C$10k · revenue -16%
  • RU
    Ryerson University
    one grant, 2017 · C$10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field
02the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
4/5
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRYERSON UNIVERSITY — C$62,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF GUELPH — C$35,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMCGILL UNIVRSITY — C$14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA — C$11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Victoria — C$10,050 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2023-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2023. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 825995384:2023-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on ICSC Foundation Canada’s filings →