Arborg, MB · Public foundation
Icelandic River Community Foundation Inc.
Organization and planning to fulfill mandate of the icelandic river community foundation inc which is to improve the quality of life within the boundaries of the rural municipality of bifrost including the town of arborg and the village of riverton.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE WINNIPEG FOUNDATION | C$8,672 |
| RIVERDALE PLACE HOMES | C$5,000 |
| RIVERDALE PLACE WORKSHOP | C$667 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- TWTHE WINNIPEG FOUNDATION7× · 2018–2024 · C$531k · revenue +451%
- RPRIVERDALE PLACE HOMES2× · 2023–2024 · C$31k · revenue +2%
- APARBOR-BIFROST PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION4× · 2018–2023 · C$14k · revenue +59%
Funded once
- RARIVERTON AND DISTRICT FRIENDSHIP CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2023 · C$100k · revenue +32%
- ASARBORG SENIORS HOUSING CORPORATION BN# 896609815RC0001 ASSone grant, 2023 · C$12k
- DLDJORFUNG LADIES AID RIVERTON MBone grant, 2023 · C$7k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Home for mentally/physically challenged
White rapids manor provides long-term nursing home care services
Provide daycare services
To provide services care and housing for adults with special needs.
Providing child care services
None
The corporation is dedicated to assisting individuals attain their optimum level of independence and quality of life in their workplace home and community. services provided include a sheltered workshop vocational recreational and…
Provide Quality Childcare Services
Provide preschool children teen youth adult and seniors programs along with fitness and aerobic programs along with licensed childcare special needs summer day camp programs.
Provides professional social and counselling services for tenants of riverdale housing action group corporation. provides tenants' childrens group day camp spring break and summer programs. provides youth cooking classes. provides various…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Morweena Evangelical Mennonite Church and the most unlike its peers is The Winnipeg Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE WINNIPEG FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RIVERTON AND DISTRICT FRIENDSHIP CENTER ↗
- Who funds RIVERDALE PLACE HOMES ↗
- Who funds ARBOR-BIFROST PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION ↗
- Who funds RIVERDALE PLACE WORKSHOP INC ↗
- Who funds INTERLAKE-EASTERN REGIONAL HEALTH AUTHORITY ↗
- Who funds MORWEENA EVANGELICAL MENNONITE CHURCH ↗
- Who funds ARBORG AND DISTRICT SENIORS RESOURCE COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds MORWEENA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INCORPORATED ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.