Skip to content

Vancouver, BC · Charitable organization

Hsef Renaissance Academy

Making gifts to qualified donees.

C$1k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
—
Regions reached
C$1k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$1,000
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$27k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EDUCATION IN ACTION SOCIETYC$1,000
02Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Child Aid International Fund Society

Making Gifts to Qualified Donees

—
2
Himalaya Foundation

The foundation provides funds to organizations that support the relief of poverty advance education and otherwise benefit the disadvantaged population of the world.

—
3
Chft Charitable Fund
—
4
Happiness of Giving Foundation

The foundation's mission is to relieve poverty by providing basic necessities of life including food clean water clothing shelter and/or medical supplies to individuals or families who are poor of low income or in need because of war or…

—
5
Cal Bombay Foundation

To support agencies specializing in agriculture in Africa.

—
6
CharityVillage Foundation
—
7
Hageman Family Foundation

Grants to support international mission and relief

—
8
World Housing Foundation

The organization received donations and made donations to other charities to support its purposes

—
9
Charlford House Foundation
—
10
Chadha Family Foundation
—
11
Zana Fund
—
12
Philadelphia Foundation
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Union Gospel Mission Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Education in Action Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRosewood Charitable Foundation — C$1,719,696 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetAga Khan Foundation of Canada — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSouthview Christian — C$5,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetCHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYaletown House Foundation — C$5,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetCommunity Health International Learning and Development — C$5,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetUnion Gospel Mission — C$3,272 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEDUCATION IN ACTION SOCIETY — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada)BC4.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada)

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2022-09-29, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2022. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under teaching institutions.

Source object 885205427:2022-09-29 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Hsef Renaissance Academy’s filings →