Winnipeg, MB · Charitable organization
House of Ashkenazie
Maintain a house of worship conduct ritual services for the congregation provide jewish education for the jewish community
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| B'NAI ZION CHARITY FUND | C$350 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 58% of grant dollars (C$12k). The 42% that went abroad (C$9k) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 42% of all-years giving (C$9k)
1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
12 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$350 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- BZBNAI ZION CHARITY3× · 2018–2020 · C$2k
- IGIndividual grant recipient4× · 2018–2022 · C$1k
- JIJewish Institute for the Blind2× · 2017–2022 · C$900
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · C$1k
- LOLubavitch of Hungaryone grant, 2018 · C$1k
- GIGeneral Israel Orphans Home for Girlsone grant, 2017 · C$600
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.