Keswick, ON · Charitable organization
Hope for Today Christian Fellowship Georgina
Biblical Teaching Bible Study Community Care and support programs for youth single parents and the elderly.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SIM | C$6,000 |
| Life 100.3 | C$3,250 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$3k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- SSIM6× · 2017–2024 · C$18k · revenue +30%
- L1Life 100.33× · 2021–2023 · C$8k · revenue +14%
- TCTeen Challenge2× · 2017–2021 · C$650 · revenue +40%
Funded once
- HFHope for Today Church Norfolkone grant, 2023 · C$15k
- WAWOMEN'S ADVOCACY YORK REGIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · C$8k · revenue +476%
- LCLAKESHORE COMMUNITY FELLOWSHIPgraduatedone grant, 2020 · C$2k · revenue +40%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Broadcasting bible teaching programs on the following stations: kari am 550 at 10am & 8pm for british columbia cjca am 930 at 5:30pm weekdays for edmonton alberta cjli am 700 at 10:30am and 8:00pm for calgary alberta ckjs am 810 at 9:15am…
Promulgation of the gospel of jesus christ maily through media
Christian radio broadcasts
We Organize Christian Gospel Campaigns and Preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ We Render Payer and Counselling Services over the phone We Evangelize using visual Audio and Print Media
To encourage teach and disciple the christian church around the world.
Preaching the gospel through broadcasting TV programs Printed publications Emergency Relief Media evangelism Campaigns
Share the Gospel within and outside of Canada through church events and outreach.
World Radio Missionary Fellowship in Canada (o/a Reach Beyond Canada) provides funds to ShareWord Global Canada and other qualified donees for ministies to church congregations and evangelism to people and groups throughout Canada and…
(1) oversea and local missionaries (2) bible study (3) pastoral counselling and preaching
We continue to proclaim the gospel of jesus christ and use discipleship programs with churches small groups individuals and through conferences of teaching preaching music and religious broadcasting through various media (digital media…
Religious television broadcasting
To provide training and teaching to Christian church leaders around the world.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sim Canada and the most unlike its peers is Blue Sea Philanthropy Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SIM ↗
- Who funds Hope for Today Church Norfolk ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S ADVOCACY YORK REGION ↗
- Who funds Life 100.3 ↗
- Who funds LAKESHORE COMMUNITY FELLOWSHIP ↗
- Who funds Canada Helps ↗
- Who funds Teen Challenge ↗
- Who funds Shareworld Global ↗
- Who funds Coldest Night of the Year ↗
- Who funds LIFE CORPS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds Home Church Ministries ↗
- Who funds Our Daily Bread ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.