Grenville Sur La Rouge, QC · Charitable organization
Holy Trinity Church
1) once a month sunday sevice in conjunction with st.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DANS LA RUE | C$50 |
| CHEZ DORIS | C$50 |
| CAMP AMY MOLSON | C$50 |
| NAZARETH HOUSE | C$50 |
| OLD BREWERY MISSION | C$50 |
| SLEEPING CJILDREN AROUND THE WORLD | C$50 |
| ST. MICHAELS MISSION | C$50 |
| FOOD BANK - GRENVILLE SUR LA ROUGE | C$50 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2021, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$100 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- CDCHEZ DORIS4× · 2018–2021 · C$200
- OBOLD BREWERY MISSION3× · 2019–2021 · C$150
- DLDANS LA RUE4× · 2019–2023 · C$150
Funded once
- OBOld Brewery Missiongraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$50 · revenue +139%
- FBFOOD BANK FOR GRENVILLE SUR LA ROUGEone grant, 2020 · C$50
- NHNazareth Housegraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$50 · revenue +172%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.