Vancouver, BC · Charitable organization
Holy Resurrection Russian Orthodox Church
Worship charitable donations cultural programs
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k1 grant · C$375
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$12k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ARCHDIOCESE OF CANADA OF THE OCA | C$12,000 |
| GREATER VANCOUVER FOOD BANK | C$375 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +82% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- AOARCHDIOCESE OF CANADA OF THE ORTHODOX CHURCH IN AMERICA8× · 2017–2024 · C$96k · revenue -99%
- SHST HERMAN OF ALASKA ORTHODOX CHURCH2× · 2019–2022 · C$6k · revenue +82%
- GVGREATER VANCOUVER FOOD BANK7× · 2017–2024 · C$3k · revenue +214%
Funded once
- SHSAINT HERMAN OF ALASKA ORTHODOX CHURCHone grant, 2021 · C$5k
- SASt. Aidan Orthodox Churchgraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$2k · revenue +109%
- ASAll Saints of Alaska Orthodox Churchone grant, 2017 · C$1k · revenue +25%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Russian greek orthodox church of all saints
We hold weekly church services choir practices book study sessoins providing teaching and practices of the orthodox christian faith including baptisms and funerals.
Orthodox religious services
Places of worship congregations parishes dioceses etc. none
Spiritual guidance and religious worship and pastoral care. bible studies and lectures. worship services held weekly and on major feast days.
We have vespers and oivine liturgy services. we have religious worship funeral services wedding ceremonies and baptisms and religious studies
Orthodox church services
We hold weekly worship services; we give pastoral care; we perform religious education for children adolescents and adults; we perform marriages baptisms and funerals
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Holy Apostles Orthodox Church and the most unlike its peers is Greater Vancouver Food Bank Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ARCHDIOCESE OF CANADA OF THE ORTHODOX CHURCH IN AMERICA ↗
- Who funds ST HERMAN OF ALASKA ORTHODOX CHURCH ↗
- Who funds GREATER VANCOUVER FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds St. Aidan Orthodox Church ↗
- Who funds All Saints of Alaska Orthodox Church ↗
- Who funds St. John in the Wilderness Orthodox Sanctuary ↗
- Who funds HOLY APOSTLES ORTHODOX MISSION ↗
- Who funds HOLY TRANSFIGURATION MONASTIC FRATERNITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.