Skip to content

Holland, MB · Public foundation

Holland and Area Donors Choice

Accept donations from community individuals to varies regristered charities of their choosing and remit these funds as requested/instructed by the donor.

C$17k
Granted FY2024still arriving
36
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$3k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$287
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$426
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STARSC$2,802
CENTRAL PLAINS CANCER CAREC$1,703
HOLLAND FIRE DEPTC$1,178
MILES FOR SENIORS INCC$1,178
HOLLAND FRIENDSHIP CENTREC$1,059
ALZHEIMERS SOCIETY OF MANITOBAC$1,035
HEART + STROKE FOUNDATIONC$896
TIGER HILLS HANDI-TRANSITC$777
HOLLAND + AREA FOUNDATIONC$728
CANADIAN DIABETESC$654
CANADIAN RED CROSSC$579
TIGER HILLS ARTS ASSOCC$500
VICTORIA LIBRARYC$450
HOLLAND MEDICAL CLINICC$431
HOLLAND DAY CARE CENTREC$431
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$129k · 39 repeat orgsC$12k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

39 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
25

Total granted

C$129k
C$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+22%

Still filing today

56%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    Stars Foundation
    5× · 2018–2022 · C$9k · revenue +89%
  • MF
    M.I.L.E.S. For Seniors Inc.
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$9k · revenue +43%
  • TH
    TIGER HILLS HANDI-TRANSIT
    7× · 2017–2023 · C$4k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • HE
    Holland Elementary School PAC
    one grant, 2017 · C$2k
  • HF
    Holland Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · C$2k
  • CR
    Canadian Red Cross
    one grant, 2017 · C$1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mitocanada Foundation

We are canada’s only not-for-profit organization focused on mitochondrial disease. our mission is to transform the outlook for persons facing a diagnosis of mitochondrial disease and/or dysfunction. we do this by 1) raising awareness 2)…

—
2
Diabetes Foundation of Manitoba Inc.

research

—
3
Ms Canada Sp Canada

We provide information and community resources to those affected by multiple sclerosis (MS). We provide assistance for clients to maintain their independence within their community. We facilitate education and support group meetings. We…

—
4
CancerCare Manitoba

Cancercare manitoba maintains and co-ordinates a province-wide program for cancer prevention diagnosis treatment education and research.

—
5
Manitoba Paraplegia Foundation Inc.

The manitoba paraplegia foundation provides financial support to manitobans living with spinal cord injury or disease that optimizes their independence self-reliance and full participation. mpf also supports projects for the cure and…

—
6
Als Action Canada Society

To support families living with als by mobilizing a patient-led public movement to ensure swift and equitable access to promising therapies and clinical trials throughout canada and to ensure the federal and provincial governments increase…

—
7
Als Society of Alberta

The als society of alberta is a charitable organization dedicated to making each day the best possible day for people living with and affected by als (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) across the province of alberta. we achieve our mission by…

—
8
Lupus Society of Manitoba Inc

Programs to establish a support system to individuals and their families in Manitoba who are affected by Lupus. Provision of a telephone service giving information and advice to callers. Publishing a newsletter providing information to…

—
9
Marigold Foundation Ltd.

Marigold organizes and promotes strategic initiatives facilitates collaboration and supports health research in myotonic dystrophy.

—
10
Multiple Myeloma Canada/Myelome Multiple Canada

Increase awareness of multiple myeloma. provide educational programs resources and support to stakeholders across canada. promote clinical research and access to new therapies treatment options and healthcare resources

—
11
Scleroderma Manitoba Inc.

Patient support and disease awareness

—
12
Psp Society of Canada

Provide information and support to families and care-partners affected by psp msa and cbd. collaborate with healthcare professionals to increase awareness and improve treatment. fund research leveraging partnerships with other charitable…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cancercare Manitoba Foundation Inc. and the most unlike its peers is The Holland Agricultural Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
23/31
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetStars Foundation — C$9,462 over 5y, 6.4% of budgetM.I.L.E.S. For Seniors Inc. — C$8,802 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetTIGER HILLS HANDI-TRANSIT — C$4,275 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetHOLLAND FRIENDSHIP CENTRE — C$3,690 over 6y, 10% of budgetPARKINSONS — C$855 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetManitoba Cancer Care — C$815 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEMMANUEL FRIENDS — C$710 over 6y, 4.7% of budgetManitoba Lung Assoc. — C$595 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCELIAC DISEASE — C$450 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetSMD — C$350 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE — C$295 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGlenboro Pallative Care — C$260 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALS — C$250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetARTHRITES FOUNDATION — C$250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLIVER FOUNDATION — C$175 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DESTROPHY — C$150 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMOUVEMENT DISORDER — C$150 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHOLLAND AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY — C$150 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetDREAM FACTORY — C$125 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHolland United Church — C$100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDOWN'S SYNDROME — C$75 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRonald McDonald House — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN HOUSE — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTourette's Research — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMADD — C$50 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALS — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHealth Science Centre — C$35 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANITOBA KIDNEY FOUNDATION — C$25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCouncil of the Blind — C$20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANITOBA DISABILITIES — C$20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetParapalegic Assoc. — C$10 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Stars Foundation ↗
  • Who funds M.I.L.E.S. For Seniors Inc. ↗
  • Who funds TIGER HILLS HANDI-TRANSIT ↗
  • Who funds HOLLAND FRIENDSHIP CENTRE ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSONS ↗
  • Who funds Manitoba Cancer Care ↗
  • Who funds EMMANUEL FRIENDS ↗
  • Who funds Manitoba Lung Assoc. ↗
  • Who funds CELIAC DISEASE ↗
  • Who funds SMD ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Glenboro Pallative Care ↗
  • Who funds ALS ↗
  • Who funds ARTHRITES FOUNDATION ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

All Charities CampaignMB10.9× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: All Charities Campaign · Starbuck All Charities Inc. · Price Family Foundation Inc. · Alan and Doreen Thompson Charitable Foundation Inc. · The Jewish Foundation of Manitoba · The Winnipeg Foundation · The Dufresne Foundation Inc. · Giftpact Foundation Inc. · Wellington West Foundation Inc. · United Way Of Brandon & District Inc. · The Gail Asper Family Foundation Inc · The Asper Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-11-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 860006030:2024-11-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Holland and Area Donors Choice’s filings →