Calgary, AB · Public foundation
Hockey Canada Foundation/Fondation Hockey Canada
Assist fund qualifying disbursements to hockey canada
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k1 grant · C$3k
- C$250k+1 grant · C$755k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HOCKEY CANADA | C$754,931 |
| FONDATION BARRY F. LORENZETTI / BARRY F. LORENZETTI FOUNDATI | C$2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 82% of grant dollars (C$10M). The 18% that went abroad (C$2.2M) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 18% of all-years giving (C$2.2M)
0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$3k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- HCHOCKAY CANADA8× · 2017–2024 · C$7.7M
- LHLOCAL HOCKEY ASSOCIATIONS2× · 2022–2023 · C$1.8M
- CTCANADIAN TIRE JUMPSTART3× · 2019–2021 · C$900k
Funded once
- MHMINOR HOCKEY ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2021 · C$427k
- J(Jumpstart (Canadian Tire) - The Big Playone grant, 2017 · C$250k · revenue +6%
- EOEDMONTON OILERS COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · C$186k · revenue ×12
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The foundation was formed to alleviate financial barriers to participating in physical activity for children in need and raises funding for this program.
Provide funds to 'qualified donees' and relieve poverty by providing hockey equipment to underpriviledged children
Support children in need for various minor hockey programs.
Provided financial assistance to players/ children in financial need to pay for their 2024-5 hockey fees equipment.
Hockey equality offers financial aid to help cover the cost of participation in kids' hockey for children andteenagers up to age 18 who are financially disadvantaged with a special emphasis in indigenous black people ofcolour females and…
Raise funds to provide sporting equipment to children within the underserved indigenous communities of wood buffalo alberta
We deepen public understanding of a selection of intellectual topics in sport and educate the public about them.
The Foundation donates funds to a wide variety of qualified donees in Winnipeg MB and surrounding communities with a specific emphasis on charities that provide under-privileged and special needs children with the opportunity to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hockey Alberta Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Fitspirit Community Organization. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Jumpstart (Canadian Tire) - The Big Play ↗
- Who funds EDMONTON OILERS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOCKEY ALBERTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMRIE'S (SOUTHERN) SPORTS EQUIPMENT BANK ↗
- Who funds Sidney Crosby Foundation ↗
- Who funds FITSPIRIT COMMUNIT ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds LACE'EM UP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TRUE NORTH YORK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FONDATION BARRY F. LORENZETTI / BARRY F. LORENZETTI FOUNDATI ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Calgary Foundation · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.