Regina, SK · Charitable organization
His Ways Ministries
A place of worship parishes for congregations missionary and evangelism
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EL ELYON ON EAGLES WINGS CHRISTIAN CENTRE | C$200 |
| SOULS HARBOUR | C$200 |
| SALVATION ARMY | C$200 |
| BILLY GRAHAHM EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION | C$100 |
| GENTLE ROAD CHURCH OF CHRIST | C$100 |
| CHRISTIAN FOR ISRAEL | C$100 |
| VOICE OF THE MARTYRS | C$100 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$200 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- SHSOULS HARBOUR RESCUE MISSION8× · 2017–2024 · C$2k · revenue +27%
- SASALVATION ARMY7× · 2018–2024 · C$2k · revenue +482%
- TVTHE VOICE OF THE MARTYRE INC8× · 2017–2024 · C$1k · revenue +38%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · C$2k
- SCSUNSHINE CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC.one grant, 2019 · C$900
- SCSONSHINE CHRISTIAN MINISTRIESone grant, 2023 · C$500 · revenue -32%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Support and maintain missions and missionaries support the publishing of reformed Christian books and education material to propagate the Reformed Faith among persons of Jewish descent and persons of all backgrounds in Israel.
To advance religion by preaching and teaching the religious tenents doctrines and observances associated with the christian faith as they relate to biblical geographical historical and present-day israel.
Bible education online bible teaching evangelism support to local churches
Television time ministry publications and mailings. we are reaching out to the church at large to educate them about their role to bring good news message to the jewish people.
Lactures on biblical israel
None
Promote interest in the study of christian faith through the distribution of christian messages teaching literature and music
Promulgation of the gospel of jesus christ maily through media
Organize workshops and congregations. preach and advance teaching the christian faith as per the holy bible.
Equip persian speakers worldwide with the teaching of god’s word through the producation and distribution of content for radio internet and other media together with ongoing follow-up so that individuals trust christ as saviour mature in…
Speaking engagements to congregations and church leaders. supporting like-minded prayer networks and ministries. online mentorship school.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christians for Israel Canada and the most unlike its peers is Options Pregnancy Center Resources and Lifestyle Coaching Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LET FAITH ARISE ↗
- Who funds SOULS HARBOUR RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds SALVATION ARMY ↗
- Who funds THE VOICE OF THE MARTYRE INC ↗
- Who funds INDEPENDENT ASSEMBLIES OF GOD INTER ↗
- Who funds SONSHINE CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds EAGLES' WINGS CHRISTIAN CENTER ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIANS FOR ISRAEL ↗
- Who funds HIS WORD FOR HIS PEOPLE ↗
- Who funds OPTIONS PREGNANCY CENTRE ↗
- Who funds EL ELYON ON EAGLES WINGS CHRISTIAN CENTRE ↗
- Who funds SHILOH ASSEMBLY ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL FAITH HEALING MIN ↗
- Who funds REGINA YOUTH FOR CHRIST ↗
- Who funds FOI GOSPEL MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds GENTLE ROAD CHURCH OF CHRIST ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF ISRAEL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.