New Norway, AB · Charitable organization
Highland Park Evangelical Free Church
Place of worship fellowship and missionary organizations.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| STREETCORNERS MIISTRIES | C$6,000 |
| LIVING SPRINGS BIBLE CAMP | C$6,000 |
| OPERATION MOBILIZATION CANADA | C$5,400 |
| EFCCM | C$4,000 |
| ETHNOS CANADA | C$2,400 |
| SMALL CHURCH CONNECTIONS | C$1,500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$4k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- EEFCCM7× · 2017–2024 · C$48k · revenue +26%
- SMSTREETCORNERS MINISTRIES7× · 2017–2024 · C$41k · revenue +52%
- APALBERTA PARKLAND DISTRICT OF THE EFC5× · 2017–2022 · C$34k · revenue +122%
Funded once
- LSLIVING SPRINGS BIBLE CAMPone grant, 2018 · C$6k
- CLCANADIAN LUTHERAN BIBLE INSTITUTEone grant, 2019 · C$1k · revenue -2%
- PBPRAIRIE BIBLE INSTITUTEone grant, 2019 · C$1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Training for christian ministry through undergraduate and graduate training.
International Christian Ministries (ICM) trains and equips Christian leaders in Africa Eastern Europe and Latin America with and through its agents. These training initiatives include various Christian seminars and conferences facilitating…
Missionary training -bible studies
To provide training and teaching to Christian church leaders around the world.
We exist to preach and advance the teachings of the Christian faith and the religious tenets doctrines and observances by providing consultation instructional material curriculum development and best practices; and to propagate the…
Provide academic training for the ministry of the gospel
Alberta bible college is a post secondary educational institution awarding four-year degrees two-year diplomas and one-year certificates in christian ministries. a two-year degree completion program in christian leadership or counselling…
Training missionaries including language school in preparation for church planting activities
A) to provide personnel and resources for christian organizations and ministries; and b) to provide training and materials to christian leaders and individuals involved in evanglism and christian ministry worldwide
Planting churches training and coaching pastors training elders resourcing churches
Operate a bible training ministry camp for all ages. leadership equipping and application programs for the upcoming staff
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Evangelical Free Church of Canada - Eglise Evangelique Libre De Canada and the most unlike its peers is Canadahelps Canadon. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EFCCM ↗
- Who funds OPERATION MOBILIZATION CANADA ↗
- Who funds STREETCORNERS MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds ALBERTA PARKLAND DISTRICT OF THE EFC ↗
- Who funds LIVING SPRINGS BIBLE CAMP ↗
- Who funds ETHNOS CANADA ↗
- Who funds ETHNOS CANADA ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN LUTHERAN BIBLE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds TORCHBEARERS CAPENWRAY CANADIAN SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds MILLAR COLLEGE OF THE BIBLE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.