Vancouver, BC · Charitable organization
Health Arts Society
Concerts in care: a programme providing professional arts performances that contribute to the quality of life for audiences in retirement homes residential care and other health care sites throughout british columbia.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k1 grant · C$5k
- C$10k–50k4 grants · C$142k
- C$50k–250k1 grant · C$83k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Societe pour les Arts en Milieux de Sante | C$83,000 |
| Concerts in Care Ontario | C$47,000 |
| Health Arts Society of Regina Corp. | C$35,000 |
| Health Arts Society of Atlantic Canada | C$30,000 |
| Health Arts Society of Alberta | C$30,000 |
| Health Arts Society of Manitoba | C$5,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$30k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- SPSociete pour les Arts en Milieux de Sante8× · 2017–2024 · C$329k · revenue +102%
- CIConcerts in Care Ontario8× · 2017–2024 · C$229k · revenue +93%
- HAHEALTH ARTS SOCIETY OF ALBERTA7× · 2017–2023 · C$220k · revenue +357% · 31% of their budget
Funded once
- HAHealth Arts Society of Albertaone grant, 2024 · C$30k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.