Oshawa, ON · Charitable organization
Healing Place
The purpose of the charity is to provide & maintain a place for worship of god.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k1 grant · C$1k
- C$10k–50k2 grants · C$47k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| The Eastern Ontario District of The Pentecostal Assemblies | C$37,086 |
| Safehope Home | C$10,019 |
| Prankard Evangelistic Association | C$1,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- TEThe Eastern Ontario District of The Pentecostal Assemblies6× · 2017–2024 · C$142k · revenue +4%
- SHSafehope Home4× · 2017–2024 · C$15k · revenue +575%
- PAPENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA3× · 2017–2019 · C$9k · revenue +22%
Funded once
- ABABORIGINAL BIBLE ACADEMYone grant, 2017 · C$600
- EFERDO Foundationone grant, 2023 · C$250
- FFFamily Foundations Canadaone grant, 2022 · C$100 · revenue +23%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Promoted the teaching and preaching of the gospel of jesus christ -ordained candidates to the gospel ministry -conducted evangelistic campaigns -operated training centre
1. teaching and preaching in churches and other Christian organizations. 2. MISSIONS WORKS OVERSEAS - humanitarian projects plus teaching leaders and supplying religious and humanitarian workers with supplies . 3. Producing and…
(1) oversea and local missionaries (2) bible study (3) pastoral counselling and preaching
Advancing the Kingdom of God through Soul Winning evangelism outreaches and Church planting. Worship & bible study. Provides aid to Peace House International Satellite Churches in 5 countries. Provide aid to low-income persons. Counselling…
Teaching at conferences seminars retreats ywam schools and missions throughout the world.
Places of Worship Congregations Religious Colleges Courses Missionary Organizations Evangelism Affordable Housing
Bible education recovery ministry prayer ministry missions to africa pakistan india
Prayer worship service training & equipping & conferences
Preaching Teaching
Visiting the spiritually troubled individuals at their place of residence and providing assistance. bible studies missionary training.
Evangelization
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Eastern Ontario District of the Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada and the most unlike its peers is Erdo Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Eastern Ontario District of The Pentecostal Assemblies ↗
- Who funds Safehope Home ↗
- Who funds PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds OSHAWA MINISTRY CENTRE GATE 3:16 ↗
- Who funds MASTER'S BIBLE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds ABORIGINAL BIBLE ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds W.I.N.G.S. MATERNITY HOME ↗
- Who funds Prankard Evangelistic Association ↗
- Who funds ICEJ CANADA AID AND DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds Family Foundations Canada ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Canadian National Christian Foundation · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · United Way of Greater Toronto · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.