Clearwater, BC · Charitable organization
Head Waters Fellowship of Christ
Weekly worship and teaching services on-line; weekly bible study on-line; homecare; eldercare; support missionaries in canada and overseas; support loacal food bank; local benevolent needs.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ETHNOS CANADA | C$9,360 |
| VAVENBY CHRISTIAN CHURCH | C$7,500 |
| CLEARWATER CHRISTIAN CHURCH | C$7,500 |
| CLEARWATER SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST | C$3,750 |
| CLEARWATER NEW LIFE ASSEMBLY | C$3,750 |
| CLEARWATER FOOD BANK | C$2,165 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2022, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$8k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- ECETHNOS CANADA6× · 2017–2022 · C$30k · revenue +21%
- VCVAVENBY CHRISTIAN CHURCH3× · 2019–2022 · C$12k · revenue +12%
- CFCLEARWATER FOOD BANK3× · 2017–2022 · C$5k · revenue +561%
Funded once
- CCClearwater Christian Churchone grant, 2017 · C$16k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.