Skip to content

Woodbridge, ON · Private foundation

HBNG Charitable Foundation

The HBNG Charitable Foundation (the 'Foundation') will make grants to qualified donees under the Income Tax Act (Canada).

C$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$1.2M
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k1 grant · C$3k
  • C$10k–50k8 grants · C$123k
  • C$250k+1 grant · C$1.2M
C$15,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UHN FoundationC$1,200,000
Kayla's Children CentreC$25,000
IC Savings FoundationC$23,340
Have a Heart Charity Golf TournamentC$18,000
City of Vaughan - Mayors GalaC$15,000
Vaughan International Film FestivalC$11,300
Caritas FoundationC$10,000
Princess Margaret Cancer FoundationC$10,000
The Angel Foundation for LearningC$10,000
Vibrant Markham FoundationC$3,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$3.4M · 5 repeat orgsC$897k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
16

Total granted

C$3.4M
C$806k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+13%

Still filing today

100%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$91k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • UF
    UHN Foundation
    5× · 2020–2024 · C$1.8M · revenue +124%
  • KC
    Kayla's Children Centre
    4× · 2021–2024 · C$80k · revenue +67%
  • TA
    The Angel Foundation for Learning
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$20k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • SF
    Sunnybrook Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$500k · revenue +77%
  • CR
    Canadian Red Crossgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · C$100k · revenue +31%
  • MC
    Maccabi Canada
    one grant, 2022 · C$28k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Hospital for Sick Children Foundation

SickKids Foundation has been inspiring our communities since 1972 to invest in improving the lives of children and their families. Donor support is a critical source of funding for the Hospital for Sick Children and in recent years has…

—
2
The Children's Hospital Foundation of Manitoba Inc

The main purpose of the foundation is to raise and distribute funds for the advancement of knowledge and care in the fields of child health research as well as to provide equipment and fund programs at the Children's Hospital of Winnipeg.…

—
3
Children's Health Foundation

Children's health foundation raises and grants funds to support specialized healthcare research and rehabilitation services and programs for infants children and youth

—
4
Alliance for CancerCare Equity

Fund raised paid for the cost of cancer treatment and related costs for patients with cancer who were without the financial means to receive adequate healthcare services and provided cancer patients and their families with mutual support

—
5
Northern Cancer Foundation

The purpose of the foundation is to raise funds which are then disbursed to health sciences north (hsn) and health sciences north research institute (hsnri). amounts received from the foundation are used to fund capital research equipment…

—
6
The Cedars Cancer Foundation at the McGill University Health Centre / La fondation du cancer des cèdres au centre universitaire de santé McGill

Purchases diagnostic equipments improve facilities for treatment and care of cancer patients continue to develop the cansupport program which offer patients and their families for psychological and humanitarian assistance support cancer…

—
7
British Columbia's Children's Hospital Foundation

To provide funding to British Columbia's Children's Hospital (a program of Provincial Health Services Authority) for research equipment education health promotion and program development.

—
8
Bc Cancer Foundation

The bc cancer foundation is the fundraising partner of bc cancer and the largest charitable funder of cancer research in this province. we enable donors to make contributions to leading-edge research that has a direct impact on…

—
9
Toronto Rehabilitation Institute Foundation

The toronto rehabilitation institute foundation's mission is to raise grant and steward funds to support the mission of the toronto rehabilitation institute (which is part of the university health network) to develop solutions for people…

—
10
Hamilton Health Sciences Foundation

Raise manage and distribute funds in support of our hospitals and cancer centre for patient care research education equipment renovations and capital expenditures.

—
11
Tomorrow Medical Foundation

funded Medical Research

—
12
Drive for the Cure Foundation

Undertake fundraising activities and donate net proceeds to other charitable organizations promarily involved in cancer research and local hospital foundations.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Childhood Cancer Canada Foundation / Fondation canadienne du cancer chez l'enfant. and the most unlike its peers is Hats On for Awareness. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
13/22
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUHN Foundation — C$1,835,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMackenzie Health Foundation — C$1,500,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetSunnybrook Foundation — C$500,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCanadian Red Cross — C$100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKayla's Children Centre — C$80,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPickering College — C$27,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCanada's Walk of Fame — C$25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBeth Sholom Synagogue — C$25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetThe Angel Foundation for Learning — C$20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHats On For Awareness — C$15,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetMichael Garron Hospital — C$12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCreating Alternatives Day Program — C$10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPrincess Margaret Cancer Foundation — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCaritas Foundation — C$10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetThe Sienna For Seniors Foundation — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVibrant Markham Foundation — C$3,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetChildhood Cancer Canada — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChildhood Cancer Canada Foundation — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJennifer Ashleigh Children's Charity — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBladder Cancer — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Toronto FoundationON9.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Toronto Foundation · Jewish Foundation of Greater Toronto · The Dr. Wolf Lebovic Charitable Foundation · The Joseph Lebovic Charitable Foundation · Conam Charitable Foundation · Wcpd Foundation · Giftpact Foundation Inc. · Aqueduct Foundation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Charities Aid Foundation Canada

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 738199280:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on HBNG’s filings →