Harbour Grace, NL · Charitable organization
Harbour Grace Pastoral Charge
Spiritual interest of the congregation including in person worship.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA - MISSION & SERVICE | C$2,666 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against -9% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2022, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$3k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- MSMission & Service Fund, The United Church of Canada2× · 2017–2018 · C$17k · revenue +22%
- TFTCP FOUNDATION2× · 2018–2019 · C$300 · revenue +25%
- CWChildren's Wish Foundation2× · 2018–2019 · C$200 · revenue +8%
Funded once
- MSMISSION & SERVICEone grant, 2021 · C$6k
- SDST.VINCENT DE PAULone grant, 2021 · C$1k
- FCFoster Children's Fundone grant, 2018 · C$518
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.