Nanaimo, BC · Charitable organization
Hammond Bay Baptist Church
To proclaim the Christian Gospel and to minister to the spiritual emotional and physical needs of people.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Baptist General Confernce of Canada | C$6,400 |
| BC Baptist Conference | C$6,000 |
| Young Life | C$1,700 |
| Island crsis Care | C$1,700 |
| Crisis Pregnancy Centre | C$1,500 |
| Salvation Army | C$1,500 |
| VMA CAnada | C$1,200 |
| Nanaimo Lighthouse Ministries | C$800 |
| Loaves And Fishes Food Bank | C$800 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
11 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$3k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- SASalvation Army8× · 2017–2024 · C$13k · revenue +304%
- ICIsland Crisis Care7× · 2017–2023 · C$12k · revenue +367%
- VCVMA Canada6× · 2019–2024 · C$7k · revenue +24% · 25% of their budget
Funded once
- ICIsland crsis Careone grant, 2024 · C$2k
- CPCrisis Pregnancy Centreone grant, 2024 · C$2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Missionary organization (recruit train & support full-time missionaries who are each doing some or all of the following: church-planting evangelism discipleship and/or serving the poor & needy. english camps other camps religious programs…
The BC Mission Boat responds to remote First Nations' communities who ask us to come and work with their children youth and community members to teach them about God and Jesus Christ. Our vision is "A thriving body of Christ…
Christian worship services on Sundays Weekly bible studies and prayer meetings Counselling Gospel outreaches Sunday school services for youth group missionary services and activities.
We operate Christian churches mission stations and residences in Taiwan and Japan.
Planting churches training and coaching pastors training elders resourcing churches
Maintained various mission ministries including church planting evangelism child care theological education food distribution and disaster relief efforts working primarily in bolivia brazil columbia costa rica guatemala honduras nicaragua…
Share the Gospel within and outside of Canada through church events and outreach.
Full operations of a church including: Weekly worship services; Pastoral care; Ministries for men women seniors youth and children; Programs providing meals to street people; Small groups in homes; Support Baptist denomination; Support…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Island Crisis Care Society and the most unlike its peers is Loaves and Fishes Community Food Bank Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.