Skip to content

Grimsby, ON · Charitable organization

Hamilton Masonic Districts' Board of Relief

During the year the board of relief has provided funding to assist individuals in need.

C$3k
Granted FY2018
14
Grants FY2018
1
Regions reached
C$200
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2018 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$200
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$128k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Living Rock MinistriesC$200
Good Shepherd Centre Food BankC$200
Salvation Army-Oakville Food BankC$200
St. Matthews House Food BankC$200
Wesley Urban Ministries Food BankC$200
Stoney Creek Community Food BankC$200
Caledonia & Dristrict Food BankC$200
Neighbour to Neighbour Food BankC$200
Mission Services-HamiltonC$200
Grimsby Benevolent FundC$200
Salvation Army-Hamilton Food BankC$200
Salvation Army-Milton Food BankC$200
West Lincoln Communiity CareC$200
Ancaster Community ServicesC$200
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$6k · 12 repeat orgsC$0 to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
0

Total granted

C$6k
C$0

Still filing today

92%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    Salvation Army-Oakville Food Bank
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$1k · revenue +855%
  • SC
    Stoney Creek Community Food Bank
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$400 · revenue +192%
  • LR
    Living Rock Ministries
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$400 · revenue +33%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

    03Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Northumberland County Foodbanks

    Provide food through a food bank for northumberland county communities

    —
    2
    Wheatland County Food Bank Society

    Providing assistance to the under-privileged by purchasing and distributing food necessities. the items are distributed through individual hampers.

    —
    3
    The Hamilton Dream Center

    We operate a food and clothing bank serving the needy in the area east of downtown hamilton. we provide life skills training and counselling to the needy. we provide for several school lunch programs and share our excess food and clothing…

    —
    4
    Community Care - St. Catharines and Thorold

    Food bank christmas bureau housing help program niagara nutrition partners

    —
    5
    Greater Hamilton Food Share

    Emergency food procurement. solicitation and distribution of food obtained from the community and from the food industry. food is distributed to local food banks hot meal programs and child nutrition programs.

    —
    6
    Cobble Hill-Mill Bay-Shawnigan Lake Food Bank Society

    We provide basic food hampers and other essentials each week for those qualified residents in need of assistance. food cleaning supplies; school supplies and christmas gifts are included.

    —
    7
    Hope Community Services

    Operates local food bank provides support and assistance to struggling members of community via government funded programs.

    —
    8
    Shoal Lake and Area Food Bank

    This food bank provide food hampers every wednesday to those experiencing food insecurity. this food bank also distributes additional 'christmas' hampers where

    —
    9
    Clearwater and District Food Bank Society

    Food bank-provide food hampers to clients in need.

    —
    10
    Stittsville Food Bank

    Food bank

    —
    11
    Weymouth Area Food Bank

    Provides food for people in need

    —
    12
    Durham and District Foodbank

    Relief of poverty providing food security to low income individuals and families

    —

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Services of Hamilton Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Caledonia and District Food Bank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    02the grantee network

    11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

    Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    7
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    11/11
    Grantees still filing
    11/11
    Grew since you first funded

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSalvation Army-Oakville Food Bank — C$1,200 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetStoney Creek Community Food Bank — C$400 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLiving Rock Ministries — C$400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGood Shepherd Centre-Food Bank — C$400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWest Lincoln Community Care — C$400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNeighbour to Neighbour Food Bank — C$400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMission Services-Hamilton — C$400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSt. Matthews Hosue Food Bank — C$400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWesley Urban Minitries Food Bank — C$400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCaledonia & District Food Bank — C$400 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGrimsby Benevolent Fund — C$400 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Greater Hamilton Food ShareON11.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Greater Hamilton Food Share · United Way Golden Horseshoe · Hamilton Community Foundation · Food Banks Canada/Banques Alimentaires Canada · David McAntony Gibson Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation Canada · Vancouver Foundation · United Way of Greater Toronto · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · My Tribute Gift Foundation · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada)

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2018-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2018. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under organizations relieving poverty.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2023) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2018, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

    Source object 118951706:2018-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

    Play a game based on Hamilton Masonic Districts' Board of Relief’s filings →