Grimsby, ON · Charitable organization
Hamilton Masonic Districts' Board of Relief
During the year the board of relief has provided funding to assist individuals in need.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Living Rock Ministries | C$200 |
| Good Shepherd Centre Food Bank | C$200 |
| Salvation Army-Oakville Food Bank | C$200 |
| St. Matthews House Food Bank | C$200 |
| Wesley Urban Ministries Food Bank | C$200 |
| Stoney Creek Community Food Bank | C$200 |
| Caledonia & Dristrict Food Bank | C$200 |
| Neighbour to Neighbour Food Bank | C$200 |
| Mission Services-Hamilton | C$200 |
| Grimsby Benevolent Fund | C$200 |
| Salvation Army-Hamilton Food Bank | C$200 |
| Salvation Army-Milton Food Bank | C$200 |
| West Lincoln Communiity Care | C$200 |
| Ancaster Community Services | C$200 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
12 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2018, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- SASalvation Army-Oakville Food Bank2× · 2017–2018 · C$1k · revenue +855%
- SCStoney Creek Community Food Bank2× · 2017–2018 · C$400 · revenue +192%
- LRLiving Rock Ministries2× · 2017–2018 · C$400 · revenue +33%
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide food through a food bank for northumberland county communities
Providing assistance to the under-privileged by purchasing and distributing food necessities. the items are distributed through individual hampers.
We operate a food and clothing bank serving the needy in the area east of downtown hamilton. we provide life skills training and counselling to the needy. we provide for several school lunch programs and share our excess food and clothing…
Food bank christmas bureau housing help program niagara nutrition partners
Emergency food procurement. solicitation and distribution of food obtained from the community and from the food industry. food is distributed to local food banks hot meal programs and child nutrition programs.
We provide basic food hampers and other essentials each week for those qualified residents in need of assistance. food cleaning supplies; school supplies and christmas gifts are included.
Operates local food bank provides support and assistance to struggling members of community via government funded programs.
This food bank provide food hampers every wednesday to those experiencing food insecurity. this food bank also distributes additional 'christmas' hampers where
Food bank-provide food hampers to clients in need.
Food bank
Provides food for people in need
Relief of poverty providing food security to low income individuals and families
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Services of Hamilton Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Caledonia and District Food Bank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Salvation Army-Oakville Food Bank ↗
- Who funds Stoney Creek Community Food Bank ↗
- Who funds Living Rock Ministries ↗
- Who funds Good Shepherd Centre-Food Bank ↗
- Who funds West Lincoln Community Care ↗
- Who funds Neighbour to Neighbour Food Bank ↗
- Who funds Mission Services-Hamilton ↗
- Who funds St. Matthews Hosue Food Bank ↗
- Who funds Wesley Urban Minitries Food Bank ↗
- Who funds Caledonia & District Food Bank ↗
- Who funds Grimsby Benevolent Fund ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Hamilton Food Share · United Way Golden Horseshoe · Hamilton Community Foundation · Food Banks Canada/Banques Alimentaires Canada · David McAntony Gibson Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation Canada · Vancouver Foundation · United Way of Greater Toronto · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · My Tribute Gift Foundation · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada)
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.