Victoria, BC · Public foundation
Habitat Conservation Trust Foundation
The foundation reviews approves and provides funding for projects undertaken by intermediaries in the following categories: Fisheries and wildlife projects: conservation and enhancement of biological diversity fish fish habitat wildlife or wildlife habitat.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k34 grants · C$242k
- C$10k–50k115 grants · C$2.8M
- C$50k–250k52 grants · C$4.9M
- C$250k+3 grants · C$1.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KINTAMA RESEARCH SERVICES LTD. | C$661,971 |
| MINISTRY OF LAND WATER AND RESOURCE STEWARDSHIP | C$623,220 |
| THE NATURE TRUST OF BRITISH COLUMBIA | C$400,000 |
| NIKANESE WAH TZEE STEWARDSHIP SOCIETY | C$228,141 |
| GALIANO CONSERVANCY ASSOCIATION | C$225,000 |
| INSTREAM FISHERIES RESEARCH INC. | C$176,639 |
| MINISTRY OF FORESTS | C$169,595 |
| Ministry of Water Land & Resource Stewardship | C$166,020 |
| MINISTRY OF FORESTS | C$163,915 |
| MINISTRY OF FORESTS | C$149,169 |
| MINISTRY OF FORESTS LANDS AND NATURAL RESOURCE OPERATIONS | C$138,857 |
| THE NATURE TRUST OF BRITISH COLUMBIA | C$135,000 |
| OKANAGAN NATION ALLIANCE | C$134,178 |
| Ministry of Water Land & Resource Stewardship | C$130,500 |
| SOCIETY FOR ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION IN NORTH CENTRAL BC | C$126,157 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 0% of grant dollars (C$0). The 100% that went abroad (C$21M) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 100% of all-years giving (C$21M)
0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
68 repeat relationships — 68 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 39 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$782k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- MOMINISTRY OF FORESTS LANDS AND NATURAL RESOURCE OPERATIONS2× · 2023–2024 · C$3.0M
- MOMINISTRY OF FORESTS2× · 2023–2024 · C$1.6M
- MOMINISTRY OF LAND WATER AND RESOURCE STEWARDSHIP2× · 2023–2024 · C$1.3M
Funded once
- MOMINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENTone grant, 2023 · C$649k
- MOMINISTRY OF FINANCEone grant, 2023 · C$238k
- CVCOMOX VALLEY LAND TRUSTone grant, 2023 · C$200k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2023–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2023–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 132 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.