Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Winnipeg, MB · Charitable organization

Grey Street United Church

Weekly worship services music ministry pastoral care bible study outreach assistance to local community donation of funds to denomination headquarters for overseas ministry activity

C$11k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$10k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$150
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$87k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
United Church of Canada Mission and Service FundC$9,958
Canadian Foodgrains BankC$680
Chalmers Neighborhood Renewal CorporationC$150
Rossbrook HouseC$125
1JustCityC$125
Agape TableC$125
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$70k · 4 repeat orgsC$4k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +132% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
10

Total granted

C$70k
C$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+132%
+21%

Still filing today

100%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA MISSION & SERVICE FUND
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$67k · revenue +22%
  • 1J
    1 JUST CITY
    3× · 2017–2021 · C$2k · revenue +330%
  • AT
    Agape Table
    3× · 2017–2024 · C$325 · revenue +132%

Funded once

  • JB
    JOHN BLACK MEMORIAL UNITED CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · C$2k · revenue +14%
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2017 · C$150 · revenue +23%
  • NM
    NPDWC Mama Bear Clangraduated
    one grant, 2020 · C$136 · revenue +49%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Winnipeg Habitat for Humanity Inc.

Mobilizing volunteers and community partners Winnipeg Habitat for Humanity works with people from all walks of life to build safe and affordable housing for purchase by low-income working families.

—
2
Winnipeg Housing Rehabilitation Corporation

Providing subsidized rental housing to low-income families; developing neighbourhood strategies for lower income households

—
3
Fh Canada

Food for the Hungry (FH) Canada part of the global FH family is a Christian not-for-profit organization dedicated to ending poverty worldwide. With partners across Canada and the world FH walks alongside vulnerable communities throughout…

—
4
End Homelessness Winnipeg Inc.

To bring together all sectors of our community to work with people who are experiencing homelessness so that together we can prevent homelessness support recovery and wellbeing find suitable housing and measure our success in ways that…

—
5
OneMeal Inc.

Prepares and gives out food packages to homeless people in toronto

—
6
University of Winnipeg Community Renewal Corporation

To support the university of winnipeg by developing a sustainable university community that promotes the attractiveness of the university to its faculty staff students and the greater community. it manages projects on behalf of the…

—
7
Habitat for Humanity Saskatoon Inc.

This organization works within saskatoon saskatchewan and surrounding communities to advance the economically disadvantaged by constructing homes at cost for the working poor and providing interest free loans to enable them to pay for such…

—
8
Manitoba Food Charter Inc.

To work with people in manitoba to increase opportunities for people to eat good food

—
9
United Way of Winnipeg

1. provide social service programs and services to citizens; 2. support and fund the creation growth and maintenance of community economic development activities that address the root cause of issues; 3. support and fund the creation…

—
10
Right to Food

Community Food Centres Canada (CFCC) builds and supports vibrant food-focused organizations in low-income communities across the country that bring people together to grow cook share and advocate for policies that improve the health and…

—
11
Cooperation Canada - Coopération Canada

Cooperation Canada is Canada's national association of international development and humanitarian organizations. Cooperation Canada brings together and advocates for effective Canadian international development assistance by convening…

—
12
Social Innovation Canada

'Provides workshops conferences and demonstration projects on Social Innovation research and similar topics including evaluation and systems change. Supports activities specifically in the social and environmental entrepreneurship sector…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centre for Christian Studies Canada Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is The University of Manitoba. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED CHURCH OF CANADA MISSION & SERVICE FUND — C$67,331 over 7y, 0.0% of budget1 JUST CITY — C$1,780 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN BLACK MEMORIAL UNITED CHURCH — C$1,555 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCanadian Foodgrains Bank — C$680 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAgape Table — C$325 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE WINNIPEG FOUNDATION — C$225 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY — C$150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNPDWC Mama Bear Clan — C$136 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCanadian Mental Health Organization — C$120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEST BROADWAY COMMUNITY SERVICES — C$105 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCenter For Christian Studies — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Centre for Truth and Reconciliation — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSALVATION ARMY — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOCAL INVESTMENT TOWARD EMPLOYMENT (L.I.T.E.) INC. — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Winnipeg Foundati…North Kildonan United…All Charities CampaignThe Jewish Foundation…Giftpact Foundation I…McClure United ChurchWestworth United Chur…First Unitarian Unive…Abundance CanadaThe Cardinal Foundati…The United Church of …Strategic Charitable …
The Winnipeg FoundationMB10.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Winnipeg Foundation · North Kildonan United Church · All Charities Campaign · The Jewish Foundation of Manitoba · Giftpact Foundation Inc. · McClure United Church · Westworth United Church · First Unitarian Universalist Church of Winnipeg Inc · Abundance Canada · The Cardinal Foundation · The United Church of Canada Foundation / Fondation de L'Église Unie Du Canada · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 118948082:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Grey Street United Church’s filings →